Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21534014›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2011

What is the role of hyperbaric oxygen in the management of diabetic foot disease?

Magnus Löndahl, Katarina Fagher, Per Katzman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magnus LöndahlInstitution of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. magnus.londahl@med.lu.se
Katarina Fagher
Per Katzman
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) is accomplished when a patient is breathing 100% oxygen in an environment with increased barometric pressure. A typical HBO treatment protocol of diabetic foot ulcer involves 20 to 40 sessions. Treatment is usually given as daily 90- to 120-minute HBO sessions at pressures between 2.0 and 2.5 absolute atmospheres. The wide use of HBO as treatment of diabetic foot ulcers over the past decades has been founded on weak scientific ground (ie, few and small prospective studies with methodologic limitations on top of case series). However, the consistency in positive outcome in these trials evaluating HBO on ulcer healing is noteworthy because these findings are in concert with data from in vitro and physiologic studies supporting the theoretic framework of HBO reversing hypoxia-induced pathology. Two well-designed randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled studies have in recent years put HBO on firmer ground as treatment of a selection of diabetic patients with chronic foot. Some evidence indicates that microvascular parameters such as transcutaneous (partial) oxygen pressure (TcPO(2)) could be useful in predicting which patients will benefit from therapy. Health economic studies suggest potential cost-effectiveness of HBO. But because these analyses are limited by their deficient primary clinical data, they should be interpreted with caution. Thus, HBO is only indicated in a selected group of patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Several key issues remain to be addressed such as developing robust criteria to determine which patients are likely to benefit and when to start and stop treatment.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootHumansHyperbaric OxygenationMicrocirculationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21534014
OpenAlexW2046238648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.