ArticleSurgery today2011
Physiological evaluation of residual stomach motility after local resection in conscious dogs.
Article in Surgery today, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Status and Challenges of Local Resection for Early Gastric Cancer in East Asia.Cancers · 2026Review
- Outcomes of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric submucosal tumors: A retrospective multicenter study at 21 Japanese institutions.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Article
- Effect of mosapride on ruminal motility in cattle.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the phenomenon of remnant gastric motility and emptying after local resection.
methodsFifteen dogs were divided into three groups: a control (CONT) group, a group that underwent local resection of the greater (GREAT) curvature, and a group that underwent resection of the lesser (LESS) curvature. We conducted a strain gauge force transducer study, a [(13)C]octanoic acid breath test ((13)C-OBT), and a mosapride citrate effect test. Based on these results, we worked out the receptive relaxation (RR), motility index (MI), and postprandial period (PP) in the postprandial state, and the frequency, duration, and MI of phase III in the fasted state. The half emptying time (T (1/2)) of (13)C-OBT was also calculated. The MI was compared according to the mosapride effect test results.
resultsPostprandial RR, antro-pyloro-duodenal coordination, and fasting contractions were maintained in all three groups. Receptive relaxation was significantly shorter in the LESS group than in the other groups. Motility index was significantly lower in both treatment groups than in the CONT group. The PP was significantly longer in the GREAT group than in the other two groups. The (13)CO(2) excretion curves did not differ significantly among the groups. The duration of phase III was remarkably less in the treatment groups than in the CONT group, and MI was significantly lower in the LESS group than in the other groups in the fasted state. The MI increased remarkably after mosapride administration in the CONT group, showing no differences in other objective groups.
conclusionGastric function was maintained after gastric local resection, although its motility decreased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.