ArticleSurgery today2011
Twenty years of countermeasures against postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Article in Surgery today, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of cohorting to reduce transmission of healthcare-associatedInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2020Pooled it
- Impact of postoperative remote infection on length of stay and medical costs in hospitals in Japan.Surgery today · 2021Article
- Article
- Nasal MRSA screening for surgical patients: predictive value for postoperative infections caused by MRSA.Surgery today · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA total of 7345 cases of digestive organ surgery were investigated over the course of 20 years.
methodsOwing to the increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, we classified our countermeasures into periods A (September 1987 to February 1990), B (March 1990 to February 1997), C (March 1997 to February 1999), D (March 1999 to October 2004), and E (November 2004 to August 2007), and compared the number of infections during these periods. In period B, cefazolin and cefotiam were administered as prophylaxis. The treatment continued for 4 days, including the day of surgery. The patients undergoing endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy were managed with nonscreening pre-emptive isolation and cohorting (NSPEI&C), regardless of whether MRSA was present. However, NSPEI&C was halted in period C, but it was thereafter implemented again, and prophylactic antibiotics were administered only on the day of surgery during period D. In period E, prophylactic antibiotics were administered for 3 days.
resultsIn period A, MRSA was contracted in 4.1% (34/833) of patients. In period B, the MRSA isolation rate decreased to 0.3% (8/2722). In period C, the MRSA isolation rate increased to 3.4% (23/681). In period D, the MRSA isolation rate fell to 2.2% (40/1807). In period E, MRSA isolation cases significantly decreased to 0.4% (5/1302; P < 0.002 vs period D).
conclusionThe comprehensive management, selection of prophylactic antibiotics, and NSPEI&C were all considered to be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21533933What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.