ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2011
Oral contraceptives in migraine therapy.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-specific management of migraine a systematic review and consensus statement from the European Headache Federation (EHF).The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Migraine and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies based on MOOSE compliant.Medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Male and female sex hormones in primary headaches.The journal of headache and pain · 2018Review
- The risk of breast cancer associated with specific patterns of migraine history.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even if sometimes combined oral contraceptives (COCs) can initiate or aggravate headaches, in particular migraine, the headaches generally tend to improve after the first months of COC use. If migraine persists, in many patients the attacks are more likely to occur during the pill-free week, and an oral contraceptive-induced menstrual migraine (OCMM) occurs. In case of OCMM, some hormonal manipulations are available, by eliminating or reducing the hormone-free interval (HFI), in order to prevent this estrogen-withdrawal headache. It is possible to use a continuous COCs regimen, to shorten the HFI to less than the traditional 7 days, to use a low-dose estrogen supplementation after the 21 days of COCs or to prescribe a progestogen-only pill (POP). Interestingly, the use of a POP is a safe option also for women suffering from migraine with aura (in which COCs are absolutely contraindicated) and a recent trial suggests that its use can reduce the frequency of migraine attacks and the duration of aura symptoms too.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.