ArticleExperimental brain research2011
Differential integration of visual and kinaesthetic signals to upright stance.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incongruity of Geometric and Spectral Markers in the Assessment of Body Sway.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Balance Adaptation While Standing on a Compliant Base Depends on the Current Sensory Condition in Healthy Young Adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Postural Changes During Exteroceptive Thin Plantar Stimulation: The Effect of Prolonged Use and Different Plantar Localizations.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019Article
- Plantar cutaneous afferents influence the perception of Subjective Visual Vertical in quiet stance.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Plantar Exteroceptive Inefficiency causes an asynergic use of plantar and visual afferents for postural control: Best means of remediation.Brain and behavior · 2017Article
- Regularity of Center of Pressure Trajectories in Expert Gymnasts during Bipedal Closed-Eyes Quiet Standing.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- Head Stability and Head-Trunk Coordination in Horseback Riders: The Contribution of Visual Information According to Expertise.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- Current concepts and future approaches to vestibular rehabilitation.Journal of neurology · 2016Review
- How Plantar Exteroceptive Efficiency Modulates Postural and Oculomotor Control: Inter-Individual Variability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Reliability, validity, and effectiveness of center of pressure parameters in assessing stabilometric platform in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: a serial cross-sectional study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014Article
- Word-induced postural changes reflect a tight interaction between motor and lexico-semantic representations.Neuroscience letters · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present experiment was designed to assess the effect of active (deliberate) maintenance of a small forward (FL) or backward body lean (BL) (about 2° ankle flexion) with respect to the spontaneous direction of balance (or neutral posture, N) on postural balance. We questioned whether BL and FL stances, which impose a volitional proprioceptive control of the body-on-support angle, could efficiently reduce mediolateral displacements of the centre of pressure (CoP) induced by the visual motion of a room and darkness. Subjects (n = 15) were asked to stand upright quietly feet together while confronted to a large visual scene rolling to 10° on either side in peripheral vision (and surrounding vertical visual references in central vision) at 0.05 Hz. CoP displacements were recorded using a force platform. Analysis of medio-lateral CoP root-mean square showed that the effect of the moving room depends on the subject's postural stability performance in the eyes open N stance condition. Two significant postural behaviours emerged. (1) The most stable subjects (G1) were not affected by the conditions of altered vision, but swayed more in BL stance than in the N stance. (2) The unstable subjects (G2) exhibited (i) larger CoP displacements in altered visual conditions and a greater coupling of the CoP with the motion of the visual scene, (ii) enhanced visual dependency with postural leaning, and (iii) decreased CoP displacements when leaning forward in the eyes open motionless scene. Interestingly, the visual quotient positively correlated with the proprioceptive quotient, indicating that the more the subjects relied heavily on the visual frame of reference (FOR) the more they were influenced by body leaning. This result suggested hence a lesser ability to use efficiently body-ground proprioceptive cues. On the whole, the present findings indicate that body leaning could provide a useful mean to assess the subject's ability to use body-ground proprioceptive cues not only to improve postural stability during eyes opening (especially during forward leaning), but also as a mean to disclose subjects' visual dependency and their associated difficulties to shift from visual to proprioceptive-based FOR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21533556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.