ArticlePLoS computational biology2011
Discovering biological progression underlying microarray samples.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- A temporal model of tumor-immune dynamics during the metastatic progression of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Extracellular matrix ligands modulate the endothelial progenitor cell secretome for enhanced angiogenesis.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Discovering cellular programs of intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of metabolic traits using LipocyteProfiler.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Dictionary learning allows model-free pseudotime estimation of transcriptomic data.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- The identification of co-expressed gene modules in Streptococcus pneumonia from colonization to infection to predict novel potential virulence genes.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- Latent periodic process inference from single-cell RNA-seq data.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Inferring Multidimensional Rates of Aging from Cross-Sectional Data.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2019Article
- Identification of Novel Genes in Human Airway Epithelial Cells associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) using Machine-Based Learning Algorithms.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Cellular network modeling and single cell gene expression analysis reveals novel hepatic stellate cell phenotypes controlling liver regeneration dynamics.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Uncovering pseudotemporal trajectories with covariates from single cell and bulk expression data.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling.Nature methods · 2017Article
- Computational approach for deriving cancer progression roadmaps from static sample data.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- A new way to build cell lineages.eLife · 2017Article
- Reconstructing the Temporal Progression of Biological Data Using Cluster Spanning Trees.IEEE transactions on nanobioscience · 2017Article
- Order Under Uncertainty: Robust Differential Expression Analysis Using Probabilistic Models for Pseudotime Inference.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Visualization and cellular hierarchy inference of single-cell data using SPADE.Nature protocols · 2016Article
- Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics.Genome research · 2015Review
- Oscope identifies oscillatory genes in unsynchronized single-cell RNA-seq experiments.Nature methods · 2015Article
- BitPhylogeny: a probabilistic framework for reconstructing intra-tumor phylogenies.Genome biology · 2015Article
- Cancer progression modeling using static sample data.Genome biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In biological systems that undergo processes such as differentiation, a clear concept of progression exists. We present a novel computational approach, called Sample Progression Discovery (SPD), to discover patterns of biological progression underlying microarray gene expression data. SPD assumes that individual samples of a microarray dataset are related by an unknown biological process (i.e., differentiation, development, cell cycle, disease progression), and that each sample represents one unknown point along the progression of that process. SPD aims to organize the samples in a manner that reveals the underlying progression and to simultaneously identify subsets of genes that are responsible for that progression. We demonstrate the performance of SPD on a variety of microarray datasets that were generated by sampling a biological process at different points along its progression, without providing SPD any information of the underlying process. When applied to a cell cycle time series microarray dataset, SPD was not provided any prior knowledge of samples' time order or of which genes are cell-cycle regulated, yet SPD recovered the correct time order and identified many genes that have been associated with the cell cycle. When applied to B-cell differentiation data, SPD recovered the correct order of stages of normal B-cell differentiation and the linkage between preB-ALL tumor cells with their cell origin preB. When applied to mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation data, SPD uncovered a landscape of ESC differentiation into various lineages and genes that represent both generic and lineage specific processes. When applied to a prostate cancer microarray dataset, SPD identified gene modules that reflect a progression consistent with disease stages. SPD may be best viewed as a novel tool for synthesizing biological hypotheses because it provides a likely biological progression underlying a microarray dataset and, perhaps more importantly, the candidate genes that regulate that progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.