ArticlePloS one2011
Finding single copy genes out of sequenced genomes for multilocus phylogenetics in non-model fungi.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA-Barcoding Identification of Plant Pathogens for Disease Diagnostics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Detection and Molecular Phylogenetic-Morphometric Characterization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evolutionary Relationship and the Sequence Similarities among Different Fungal Species Infecting Birds Captured from Different Areas in Denmark.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Article
- SNP4OrphanSpecies: A bioinformatics pipeline to isolate molecular markers for studying genetic diversity of orphan species.Biodiversity data journal · 2022Article
- Comparison of Deep-Sea Picoeukaryotic Composition Estimated from the V4 and V9 Regions of 18S rRNA Gene with a Focus on the Hadal Zone of the Mariana Trench.Microbial ecology · 2022Article
- A Fresh Look at Grape Powdery Mildew (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Promising Perspectives for Detection, Identification, and Quantification of Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Oomycetes through Targeting Mitochondrial DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Genome-based classification of Burkholderia cepacia complex provides new insight into its taxonomic status.Biology direct · 2020Article
- Fast and reliable molecular methods to detect fungal pathogens in woody plants.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Molecular assays to detect the presence and viability of Phytophthora ramorum and Grosmannia clavigera.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- A comprehensive fungi-specific 18S rRNA gene sequence primer toolkit suited for diverse research issues and sequencing platforms.BMC microbiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Comparative genomics to explore phylogenetic relationship, cryptic sexual potential and host specificity of Rhynchosporium species on grasses.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes.Persoonia · 2015Article
- Environmental genes and genomes: understanding the differences and challenges in the approaches and software for their analyses.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback.Molecular plant pathology · 2014Review
- Article
- Oligonucleotide primers for targeted amplification of single-copy nuclear genes in apocritan Hymenoptera.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, fungal multigene phylogenies have been reconstructed based on a small number of commonly used genes. The availability of complete fungal genomes has given rise to a new wave of model organisms that provide large number of genes potentially useful for building robust gene genealogies. Unfortunately, cross-utilization of these resources to study phylogenetic relationships in the vast majority of non-model fungi (i.e. "orphan" species) remains an unexamined question. To address this problem, we developed a method coupled with a program named "PHYLORPH" (PHYLogenetic markers for ORPHans). The method screens fungal genomic databases (107 fungal genomes fully sequenced) for single copy genes that might be easily transferable and well suited for studies at low taxonomic levels (for example, in species complexes) in non-model fungal species. To maximize the chance to target genes with informative regions, PHYLORPH displays a graphical evaluation system based on the estimation of nucleotide divergence relative to substitution type. The usefulness of this approach was tested by developing markers in four non-model groups of fungal pathogens. For each pathogen considered, 7 to 40% of the 10-15 best candidate genes proposed by PHYLORPH yielded sequencing success. Levels of polymorphism of these genes were compared with those obtained for some genes traditionally used to build fungal phylogenies (e.g. nuclear rDNA, β-tubulin, γ-actin, Elongation factor EF-1α). These genes were ranked among the best-performing ones and resolved accurately taxa relationships in each of the four non-model groups of fungi considered. We envision that PHYLORPH will constitute a useful tool for obtaining new and accurate phylogenetic markers to resolve relationships between closely related non-model fungal species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.