ArticlePloS one2011
Functional genomics unique to week 20 post wounding in the deep cone/fat dome of the Duroc/Yorkshire porcine model of fibroproliferative scarring.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of cutaneous wound healing in swine.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review Comparing Animal and Human Scarring Models.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- In-depth examination of hyperproliferative healing in two breeds ofAnimal models and experimental medicine · 2021Article
- "Living Well" After Burn Injury: Using Case Reports to Illustrate Significant Contributions From the Burn Model System Research Program.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2021Review
- Caveolin-1 as a target in prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2019Review
- Skin aging as a mechanical phenomenon: The main weak links.Nutrition and healthy aging · 2018Article
- Interfacial Adipose Tissue in Systemic Sclerosis.Current rheumatology reports · 2017Review
- Skin aging: are adipocytes the next target?Aging · 2016Review
- Current concepts related to hypertrophic scarring in burn injuries.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2016Review
- Dermal adipocytes and hair cycling: is spatial heterogeneity a characteristic feature of the dermal adipose tissue depot?Experimental dermatology · 2016Article
- Dermal Adipocytes: From Irrelevance to Metabolic Targets?Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2016Review
- Dermal Fibroblasts from the Red Duroc Pig Have an Inherently Fibrogenic Phenotype: An In Vitro Model of Fibroproliferative Scarring.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2015Article
- Race and Melanocortin 1 Receptor Polymorphism R163Q Are Associated with Post-Burn Hypertrophic Scarring: A Prospective Cohort Study.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2015Article
- Article
- Transcriptional profiling of rapamycin-treated fibroblasts from hypertrophic and keloid scars.Annals of plastic surgery · 2014Article
- Re-Epithelialisation in a Yorkshire Pig Full-Thickness Excisional Wound Model Is Associated With Keratinocyte Activation, Oxidative Stress, and Biomacromolecule Oxidation.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypertrophic scar was first described over 100 years ago; PubMed has more than 1,000 references on the topic. Nevertheless prevention and treatment remains poor, because 1) there has been no validated animal model; 2) human scar tissue, which is impossible to obtain in a controlled manner, has been the only source for study; 3) tissues typically have been homogenized, mixing cell populations; and 4) gene-by-gene studies are incomplete. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe have assembled a system that overcomes these barriers and permits the study of genome-wide gene expression in microanatomical locations, in shallow and deep partial-thickness wounds, and pigmented and non-pigmented skin, using the Duroc(pigmented fibroproliferative)/Yorkshire(non-pigmented non-fibroproliferative) porcine model. We used this system to obtain the differential transcriptome at 1, 2, 3, 12 and 20 weeks post wounding. It is not clear when fibroproliferation begins, but it is fully developed in humans and the Duroc breed at 20 weeks. Therefore we obtained the derivative functional genomics unique to 20 weeks post wounding. We also obtained long-term, forty-six week follow-up with the model. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: 1) The scars are still thick at forty-six weeks post wounding further validating the model. 2) The differential transcriptome provides new insights into the fibroproliferative process as several genes thought fundamental to fibroproliferation are absent and others differentially expressed are newly implicated. 3) The findings in the derivative functional genomics support old concepts, which further validates the model, and suggests new avenues for reductionist exploration. In the future, these findings will be searched for directed networks likely involved in cutaneous fibroproliferation. These clues may lead to a better understanding of the systems biology of cutaneous fibroproliferation, and ultimately prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.