Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21533106›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Functional genomics unique to week 20 post wounding in the deep cone/fat dome of the Duroc/Yorkshire porcine model of fibroproliferative scarring.

Loren H Engrav, Christopher K Tuggle, Kathleen F Kerr, Kathy Q Zhu, Surawej Numhom, Oliver P Couture, Richard P Beyer, Anne M Hocking, Gretchen J Carrougher, Maria Luiza C Ramos and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of cutaneous wound healing in swine.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. In-depth examination of hyperproliferative healing in two breeds ofAnimal models and experimental medicine · 2021
    Article
  4. "Living Well" After Burn Injury: Using Case Reports to Illustrate Significant Contributions From the Burn Model System Research Program.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Interfacial Adipose Tissue in Systemic Sclerosis.Current rheumatology reports · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Current concepts related to hypertrophic scarring in burn injuries.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Dermal Adipocytes: From Irrelevance to Metabolic Targets?Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Re-Epithelialisation in a Yorkshire Pig Full-Thickness Excisional Wound Model Is Associated With Keratinocyte Activation, Oxidative Stress, and Biomacromolecule Oxidation.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Loren H EngravDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. engrav@u.washington.edu
Christopher K Tuggle
Kathleen F Kerr
Kathy Q Zhu
Surawej Numhom
Oliver P Couture
Richard P Beyer
Anne M Hocking
Gretchen J Carrougher
Maria Luiza C Ramos
Matthew B Klein
Nicole S Gibran

Funding

Inflammation and the Response to InjuryU54GM062119 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOLDAWER, LYLE L · 2001 to 2010
$78.6M
Hypertrophic Scarring After Partial-Thickness WoundsR21GM074673 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ENGRAV, LOREN H · 2005 to 2006
$369k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R21GM074673NIGMS NIH HHS 5U54GM062119-09NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM074673NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM062119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertrophic scar was first described over 100 years ago; PubMed has more than 1,000 references on the topic. Nevertheless prevention and treatment remains poor, because 1) there has been no validated animal model; 2) human scar tissue, which is impossible to obtain in a controlled manner, has been the only source for study; 3) tissues typically have been homogenized, mixing cell populations; and 4) gene-by-gene studies are incomplete. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe have assembled a system that overcomes these barriers and permits the study of genome-wide gene expression in microanatomical locations, in shallow and deep partial-thickness wounds, and pigmented and non-pigmented skin, using the Duroc(pigmented fibroproliferative)/Yorkshire(non-pigmented non-fibroproliferative) porcine model. We used this system to obtain the differential transcriptome at 1, 2, 3, 12 and 20 weeks post wounding. It is not clear when fibroproliferation begins, but it is fully developed in humans and the Duroc breed at 20 weeks. Therefore we obtained the derivative functional genomics unique to 20 weeks post wounding. We also obtained long-term, forty-six week follow-up with the model. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: 1) The scars are still thick at forty-six weeks post wounding further validating the model. 2) The differential transcriptome provides new insights into the fibroproliferative process as several genes thought fundamental to fibroproliferation are absent and others differentially expressed are newly implicated. 3) The findings in the derivative functional genomics support old concepts, which further validates the model, and suggests new avenues for reductionist exploration. In the future, these findings will be searched for directed networks likely involved in cutaneous fibroproliferation. These clues may lead to a better understanding of the systems biology of cutaneous fibroproliferation, and ultimately prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scarring.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGenomicsAnimalsCicatrixFemaleGene Expression ProfilingSwineWound HealingWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID21533106
PMCPMC3080398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.