Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21533089›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Short interspersed element (SINE) depletion and long interspersed element (LINE) abundance are not features universally required for imprinting.

Michael Cowley, Anna de Burca, Ruth B McCole, Mandeep Chahal, Ghazal Saadat, Rebecca J Oakey, Reiner Schulz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physiology of the read-write genome.The Journal of physiology · 2014
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Long non-coding RNA modifies chromatin: epigenetic silencing by long non-coding RNAs.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael CowleyDepartment of Medical & Molecular Genetics, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Anna de Burca
Ruth B McCole
Mandeep Chahal
Ghazal Saadat
Rebecca J Oakey
Reiner Schulz
King's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085448Wellcome Trust 085448\Z\08\Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is a form of gene dosage regulation in which a gene is expressed from only one of the alleles, in a manner dependent on the parent of origin. The mechanisms governing imprinted gene expression have been investigated in detail and have greatly contributed to our understanding of genome regulation in general. Both DNA sequence features, such as CpG islands, and epigenetic features, such as DNA methylation and non-coding RNAs, play important roles in achieving imprinted expression. However, the relative importance of these factors varies depending on the locus in question. Defining the minimal features that are absolutely required for imprinting would help us to understand how imprinting has evolved mechanistically. Imprinted retrogenes are a subset of imprinted loci that are relatively simple in their genomic organisation, being distinct from large imprinting clusters, and have the potential to be used as tools to address this question. Here, we compare the repeat element content of imprinted retrogene loci with non-imprinted controls that have a similar locus organisation. We observe no significant differences that are conserved between mouse and human, suggesting that the paucity of SINEs and relative abundance of LINEs at imprinted loci reported by others is not a sequence feature universally required for imprinting.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsDNA MethylationHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLShort Interspersed Nucleotide Elements

Identifiers

PMID21533089
PMCPMC3080381
OpenAlexW2000628346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.