Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21532774›Full record

ArticleCurrent cardiology reviews2010

Genetics of congenital heart disease.

Ashleigh A Richards, Vidu Garg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current cardiology reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Coordination of cardiogenesis in vivo and in vitro.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The molecular mechanisms of cardiac development and related diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Investigation of the Role ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashleigh A RichardsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Vidu Garg
The Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular malformations are the most common type of birth defect and result in significant mortality worldwide. The etiology for the majority of these anomalies remains unknown but genetic factors are being recognized as playing an increasingly important role. Advances in our molecular understanding of normal heart development have led to the identification of numerous genes necessary for cardiac morphogenesis. This work has aided the discovery of an increasing number of monogenic causes of human cardiovascular malformations. More recently, studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms and submicroscopic copy number abnormalities as having a role in the pathogenesis of congenital heart disease. This review discusses these discoveries and summarizes our increasing understanding of the genetic basis of congenital heart disease.

Indexed as

cardiac development.Congenital heart diseasegenetics

Identifiers

PMID21532774
PMCPMC2892081
OpenAlexW2079771882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.