Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21532737›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

A phase two randomised controlled double blind trial of high dose intravenous methylprednisolone and oral prednisolone versus intravenous normal saline and oral prednisolone in individuals with leprosy type 1 reactions and/or nerve function impairment.

Stephen L Walker, Peter G Nicholls, Sushmita Dhakal, Rachel A Hawksworth, Murdo Macdonald, Kishori Mahat, Shudan Ruchal, Sushma Hamal, Deanna A Hagge, Kapil D Neupane and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Corticosteroids for treating nerve damage in leprosy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Leprosy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gene Expression Profile ofFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Treatment and Evaluation Advances in Leprosy Neuropathy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Viral Co-infection and Leprosy Outcomes: A Cohort Study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015
    Article
  17. Household costs of leprosy reactions (ENL) in rural India.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephen L WalkerDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. steve.walker@lshtm.ac.uk
Peter G Nicholls
Sushmita Dhakal
Rachel A Hawksworth
Murdo Macdonald
Kishori Mahat
Shudan Ruchal
Sushma Hamal
Deanna A Hagge
Kapil D Neupane
Diana N J Lockwood
Anandaban Hospital · NPLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy Type 1 reactions are a major cause of nerve damage and the preventable disability that results. Type 1 reactions are treated with oral corticosteroids and there are few data to support the optimal dose and duration of treatment. Type 1 reactions have a Th1 immune profile: cells in cutaneous and neural lesions expressing interferon-γ and interleukin-12. Methylprednisolone has been used in other Th1 mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis in an attempt to switch off the immune response and so we investigated the efficacy of three days of high dose (1 g) intravenous methylprednisolone at the start of prednisolone therapy in leprosy Type 1 reactions and nerve function impairment.

resultsForty-two individuals were randomised to receive methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone (n = 20) or oral prednisolone alone (n = 22). There were no significant differences in the rate of adverse events or clinical improvement at the completion of the study. However individuals treated with methylprednisolone were less likely than those treated with prednisolone alone to experience deterioration in sensory function between day 29 and day 113 of the study. The study also demonstrated that 50% of individuals with Type 1 reactions and/or nerve function impairment required additional prednisolone despite treatment with 16 weeks of corticosteroids.

conclusionsThe study lends further support to the use of more prolonged courses of corticosteroid to treat Type 1 reactions and the investigation of risk factors for the recurrence of Type 1 reaction and nerve function impairment during and after a corticosteroid treatment.

trial registrationControlled-Trials.com ISRCTN31894035.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInjections, IntravenousLeprosyMaleMethylprednisoloneMiddle AgedPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPrednisoloneTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultImmunosuppressive AgentsMethylprednisolonePrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID21532737
PMCPMC3075223
OpenAlexW2009829205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.