Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21532508›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2011

Preoperative taxane-based chemotherapy and celecoxib for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: results of a phase 2 trial.

Nasser K Altorki, Paul Christos, Jeff L Port, Paul C Lee, Farooq Mirza, Cathy Spinelli, Roger Keresztes, Debra Beneck, Subroto Paul, Brendon M Stiles and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nasser K AltorkiThoracic Surgery Division, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York 10021, USA. nkaltork@med.cornell.edu
Paul Christos
Jeff L Port
Paul C Lee
Farooq Mirza
Cathy Spinelli
Roger Keresztes
Debra Beneck
Subroto Paul
Brendon M Stiles
Yuwei Zhang
David S Schrump
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USNational Cancer Institute · USStony Brook University Hospital · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024996 · NCRR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2007 to 2011
$49.6M
Targeting the Epigenome for the Treatment and PreventionZ01SC010093 · SC · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHRUMP, DAVID · 1997 to 2008
$4.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 SC010093NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024996NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of pathological response after preoperative celecoxib and concurrent taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

methodsThirty-nine patients were enrolled in this single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients were administered daily celecoxib in combination with two to three cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel with preoperative intent. Levels of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in resected tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and correlated with clinical outcome measures. Postoperatively, patients were administered daily celecoxib for 1 year or until documented tumor recurrence.

resultsAll patients received two to three cycles of chemotherapy plus celecoxib 800 mg/d. Toxicities were as expected. A major clinical response (complete response + partial response) was noted in 22 patients (56%); six patients (15%) had a complete clinical response. Thirty-seven patients underwent esophagectomy. Five patients had a major pathological response (12.8%). Four-year overall and disease-free survivals were 40.9% and 30.3%, respectively. Patients with tumors expressing COX-2 demonstrated a higher likelihood of a major clinical response response (62% versus 50%) and an improved overall survival, compared with patients with COX-2-negative tumors.

conclusionsPreoperative celecoxib with concurrent chemotherapy demonstrated sufficient effect on pathologic response to warrant further study. Patients with tumors expressing COX-2 demonstrated trends toward improved response to preoperative therapy and improved overall survival compared with nonexpressors.

Indexed as

Esophagogastric JunctionPreoperative CareAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged-Ring CompoundsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2Esophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPyrazolesBridged-Ring CompoundsCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2PyrazolesSulfonamidestaxaneTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID21532508
PMCPMC7457227
OpenAlexW2003134638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.