Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21530616›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2011

Up-regulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents by prostaglandin E₂ in type-4 rat dorsal root ganglion cells.

P K Tripathi, C G Cardenas, C A Cardenas, R S Scroggs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Prostaglandin ERespiratory research · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Prostaglandin EInflammation · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P K TripathiDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
C G Cardenas
C A Cardenas
R S Scroggs
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

SEROTONERGIC MODULATION OF SENSORY INFORMATIONR01NS037067 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI SCROGGS, REESE SCHILLER · 1998 to 2001
$231k
NINDS NIH HHS NS37067NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS037067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms were studied by which prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) up-regulates Na(+) currents (INa) in medium diameter dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells that express large T-type Ca(2+) currents (type-4 DRG cells). PGE(2) or the adenylyl cyclase (AC) activator forskolin (10 μM) up-regulated peak INa evoked by test potentials (TP) to -10 mV by an average of 13.5% and 21.8%, respectively. The PGE(2) and forskolin induced up-regulation of INa, evoked with TPs to -10 mV, began approximately 15-20 s after initiation of drug exposure and continued gradually over the course of 2-3 min. Both PGE(2) and forskolin significantly increased peak conductance without significantly shifting the voltage at which INa was ½ activated (V(a)) or ½ steady state inactivated. However, although V(a) was not significantly shifted, both PGE(2) and forskolin induced a proportionally greater percent increase in conductance at weak TPs to around -30 mV compared to stronger TPs to around 10 mV. The PGE(2)-induced up-regulation of INa was occluded by prior up-regulation with forskolin, and the up-regulation of INa by both PGE(2) and forskolin was blocked by Rp-cAMPs and 50 nM tetrodotoxin (TTX). In the presence of Rp-cAMPs, both PGE(2) and forskolin induced decreases in INa that peaked around 25 s following initiation of PGE(2)/forskolin application. The decrease induced by PGE(2) averaged 8.5%, which was significantly greater than the average 3.5% decrease induced by forskolin. Estimation of kinetic rate constants by fitting INa with a Markov channel state model, suggested that both PGE(2) and forskolin up-regulated INa by changing channel gating rather than by increasing channel number or unitary conductance. The data suggest that application of PGE(2) may initially induce a relatively rapid down-regulation of TTX-sensitive INa (signaling pathway uncharacterized), followed by a gradual up-regulation of INa via activation of an AC/PKA-dependent signaling pathway. The up-regulation of INa in sensory neurons with type-4 cell bodies may increase excitability and strengthen signaling, and may play some role in the allodynia and hyperalgesia associated with injury to nerves and peripheral tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysicsCells, CulturedColforsinCyclic AMPDinoprostoneDrug InteractionsGanglia, SpinalMaleMarkov ChainsModels, BiologicalPatch-Clamp TechniquesProtein Kinase InhibitorsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySensory Receptor Cellsadenosine-3',5'-cyclic phosphorothioateColforsinCyclic AMPDinoprostoneProtein Kinase InhibitorsSodium Channel BlockersSodium ChannelsTetrodotoxinThionucleotides

Identifiers

PMID21530616
PMCPMC3112009
OpenAlexW1973654257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.