Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21530608›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology2011

Control of synapse development and plasticity by Rho GTPase regulatory proteins.

Kimberley F Tolias, Joseph G Duman, Kyongmi Um

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular organization of central cholinergic synapses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberley F ToliasDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. tolias@bcm.edu
Joseph G Duman
Kyongmi Um
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Rho GTPase-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Underlying Memory in Health and DiseaseR01NS062829 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI TOLIAS, KIMBERLY R · 2009 to 2025
$4.4M
Mechanisms of Brain-specific Angiogenesis Inhibitor 1 (BAI1) in neural developmenK01MH086119 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DUMAN, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2013
$506k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH086119NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapses are specialized cell-cell contacts that mediate communication between neurons. Most excitatory synapses in the brain are housed on dendritic spines, small actin-rich protrusions extending from dendrites. During development and in response to environmental stimuli, spines undergo marked changes in shape and number thought to underlie processes like learning and memory. Improper spine development, in contrast, likely impedes information processing in the brain, since spine abnormalities are associated with numerous brain disorders. Elucidating the mechanisms that regulate the formation and plasticity of spines and their resident synapses is therefore crucial to our understanding of cognition and disease. Rho-family GTPases, key regulators of the actin cytoskeleton, play essential roles in orchestrating the development and remodeling of spines and synapses. Precise spatio-temporal regulation of Rho GTPase activity is critical for their function, since aberrant Rho GTPase signaling can cause spine and synapse defects as well as cognitive impairments. Rho GTPases are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and inhibited by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). We propose that Rho-family GEFs and GAPs provide the spatiotemporal regulation and signaling specificity necessary for proper Rho GTPase function based on the following features they possess: (i) existence of multiple GEFs and GAPs per Rho GTPase, (ii) developmentally regulated expression, (iii) discrete localization, (iv) ability to bind to and organize specific signaling networks, and (v) tightly regulated activity, perhaps involving GEF/GAP interactions. Recent studies describe several Rho-family GEFs and GAPs that uniquely contribute to spinogenesis and synaptogenesis. Here, we highlight several of these proteins and discuss how they occupy distinct biochemical niches critical for synaptic development.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsGTPase-Activating ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuromuscular JunctionNeuronsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsSynapsesGTPase-Activating ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsNerve Tissue Proteinsrho GTPase-activating protein

Identifiers

PMID21530608
PMCPMC3129138
OpenAlexW2030930681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.