Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21529781›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2011

Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia II: developing imaging biomarkers to enhance treatment development for schizophrenia and related disorders.

Cameron S Carter, Deanna M Barch, Edward Bullmore, James Breiling, Robert W Buchanan, Pamela Butler, Jonathan D Cohen, Mark Geyer, Randy Gollub, Michael F Green and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. An Update on Promising Biomarkers in Schizophrenia.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Roadmap for the Development of Applied Computational Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Cameron S CarterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California, USA. cameron.carter@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Deanna M Barch
Edward Bullmore
James Breiling
Robert W Buchanan
Pamela Butler
Jonathan D Cohen
Mark Geyer
Randy Gollub
Michael F Green
Judith Jaeger
John H Krystal
Holly Moore
Keith Nuechterlein
Trevor Robbins
Steven Silverstein
Edward E Smith
Milton Strauss
Til Wykes

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
Brain-Based Treatment--Impaired Cognition SchizophreniaR13MH078710 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CARTER, CAMERON S. · 2006 to 2010
$589k
Medical Research Council G0400999NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024139NIMH NIH HHS R13 MH078710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) initiative, funded by an R13 from the National Institute of Mental Health, seeks to enhance translational research in treatment development for impaired cognition in schizophrenia by developing tools from cognitive neuroscience into useful measures of treatment effects on behavior and brain function. An initial series of meetings focused on the selection of a new set of tasks from cognitive neuroscience for the measurement of treatment effects on specific cognitive and neural systems. Subsequent validation and optimization studies are underway and a subset of validated measures with well-characterized psychometric properties will be generally available in 2011. This article describes results of the first meeting of the second phase of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia, which seeks to develop imaging biomarkers and improved animal models to enhance translational research. In this meeting, we considered issues related to the use of methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and transcranial magnetic simulation as biomarkers for treatment development. We explored the biological nature of the signals measured by each method, their validity and reliability as measures of cognition-related neural activity, potential confounds related to drug effects on the signal of interest, and conceptual, methodological, and pragmatic issues related to their use in preclinical, first into human, and multicenter phase II and III studies. This overview article describes the background and goals of the meeting together with a summary of the major issues discussed in more detail in the accompanying articles appearing in this issue of Biological Psychiatry.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, PharmacologicalAnimalsBrain MappingCognition DisordersDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryHumansSchizophreniaBiomarkers, Pharmacological

Identifiers

PMID21529781
PMCPMC3116022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.