SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2011
Surgical techniques and return to work following carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality analysis of prior systematic reviews of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of the literature.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2022Pooled it
- Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Psychological approach of occupational health service to sick leave due to mental problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2015Pooled it
- Endoscopic and Open Release Similarly Safe for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Open and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Within the Same Patient.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Trial
- Return-to-Work and Early Functional Recovery Following Office-Based Ultrasound-Guided Microinvasive Carpal Tunnel Release: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Return-to-Work After Carpal Tunnel Release Across Surgical Techniques: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Patient-reported outcomes and functional recovery after carpal tunnel surgery in a developing health care system: insights from clinical practice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anatomic Variation of the Hamate Hook as a Potential Risk in Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024Article
- Optimizing Recovery After Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Release Surgery: The Role of Counseling in Pain Management and Perioperative Functional Enhancement.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Update on surgical procedures for carpal tunnel syndrome: What is the current evidence and practice? What are the future research directions?World journal of orthopedics · 2023Review
- Surgeons' Recommendations for Return to Work After Carpal Tunnel Release.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Two-port Endoscopic Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - A Prospective Cohort Study.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2022Article
- Carpal tunnel syndrome and work.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2015Review
- Sickness absence from work among persons with new physician-diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome: a population-based matched-cohort study.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis systematic review was conducted to evaluate return to work (RTW) following minimally invasive carpal tunnel surgery versus open carpal tunnel release. This study also assesses how RTW as an outcome measure was examined in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsThe bibliographic databases Medline, AMED and CINAHL were systematically searched. We found 15 relevant RCTs. Meta-analysis was possible only for four studies.
resultsThe result indicates that minimally invasive surgery offers earlier return to work compared to open carpal tunnel release (mean difference -7.2 days; 95% CI -10 to -4.4 days). There were remarkable inconsistencies in how return to work as an outcome measure was examined in different RCTs.
conclusionsCalculating standardised mean difference in future RCTs would allow future reviews to be more inclusive of the evidence. The authors suggest more consistent approach for evaluating work-related features in future studies. We recommend that new fit note categories introduced by UK Department of Work and Pension (unfit for all work/return to modified work or work adaptations/return to normal work) would be used to identify different levels of return to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.