ArticleThe international journal of diversity in organisations, communities and nations2009
Community Partners in Care: Leveraging Community Diversity to Improve Depression Care for Underserved Populations.
Article in The international journal of diversity in organisations, communities and nations, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01699789 (CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CPIC is a Community Partnered Participatory Research (CPPR) Project of Community and Academic Partners Working Together to Learn the Best Way to Reduce Depression in Our Communities.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engaging Community Networks to Improve Depression Services: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Community Engagement and Planning Intervention.Community mental health journal · 2021Trial
- Participation in Training for Depression Care Quality Improvement: A Randomized Trial of Community Engagement or Technical Support.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2015Trial
- 12-month outcomes of community engagement versus technical assistance to implement depression collaborative care: a partnered, cluster, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2014Trial
- An implementation evaluation of the community engagement and planning intervention in the CPIC Depression Care Improvement Trial.Community mental health journal · 2014Trial
- Partnered evaluation of a community engagement intervention: use of a kickoff conference in a randomized trial for depression care improvement in underserved communities.Ethnicity & disease · 2011Trial
- Ethnoracial inequities in social stressors and patterns of alcohol use in a population of United States transgender Veterans.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Adjournment in Community HIV Prevention: Exploring Transitions in Community-Academic Partnerships.Health promotion practice · 2020Article
- From subject to participant: ethics and the evolving role of community in health research.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Community Partners in Care (CPIC): Video Summary of Rationale, Study Approach / Implementation, and Client 6-month Outcomes.CES4Health.info · 2014Article
- Community-partnered research conference model: the experience of Community Partners in Care study.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2014Article
- An Exploration of the Effect of Community Engagement in Research on Perceived Outcomes of Partnered Mental Health Services Projects().Society and mental health · 2011Article
- Using Stakeholder Input to Inform an Innovative Research and Policy Initiative to Improve Depression in Safety Net Communities.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and actionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research suggests that the quality and outcomes of depression treatment for adults can be substantially improved through "collaborative care" programs. However, there is a lack of resources required to implement such programs in vulnerable communities. Our paper examines the planning phase of the Community Partners in Care (CPIC) initiative, which addresses this problem through a unique approach in which academic institutions partner directly with a wide range of community-based and service organizations in all phases of the project fielded in two underserved communities in Los Angeles. CPIC offers a unique opportunity to understand how diverse organizations can work together to address community depression care needs and to analyze the potential strengths and tradeoffs of coordinating among such varied entities. This article focuses on intra-group dynamics that surround the process of participatory research and reports results of the first wave of process evaluation of the planning phase of the CPIC initiative. Our analysis explores two main themes: Community-Partnered Participatory Research and benefits and challenges of collaboration in diverse groups.
Identifiers
21528111PMC3082465What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.