ArticleMolecular vision2011
A novel mutation in γD-crystallin associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a Chinese family.
Article in Molecular vision, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel GJA3 mutation causing autosomal dominant congenital perinuclear cataracts.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- A potential novel role of the R36P mutation in CRYGD in congenial cataract.Molecular vision · 2024Article
- Congenital coralliform cataract is the predominant consequence of a recurrent mutation in the CRYGD gene.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Two Pathogenic Gene Mutations Identified Associating with Congenital Cataract and Iris Coloboma Respectively in a Chinese Family.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- In silico analysis of five missense mutations in CYP1B1 gene in Pakistani families affected with primary congenital glaucoma.International ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Novel mutations in CRYGD are associated with congenital cataracts in Chinese families.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A nonsense mutation of γD-crystallin associated with congenital nuclear and posterior polar cataract in a Chinese family.International journal of medical sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify the pathogenic gene mutation in a Chinese family with autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract.
methodsAfter obtaining informed consent, detailed ophthalmic examinations were performed and genomic DNAs were obtained from eleven family members in a three-generation Chinese family with five affected. All exons of candidate genes associated with congenital nuclear cataract were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the PCR products were sequenced in both directions. The hydrophobic property of the mutant protein was analyzed with bioinformatics program ProtScale. The structure homology modeling of the mutant protein was based on Swiss-Model Serve, and its structure was displayed and compared with native γD-crystallin (CRYGD) using the RasMol software.
resultsBy sequencing the encoding regions of the candidate genes, a novel mutation (c.110G>C) was detected in exon 2 of CRYGD, which resulted in the substitution of a highly conserved arginine by proline at codon 36 (p.R36P). The mutation co-segregated with all patients and was absent in 100 normal Chinese controls. Bioinformatics analysis showed an obvious increase of the local hydrophilicity of the R36P mutant γD-crystallin. The homology modeling showed that the structure of the mutant protein was similar with that of native human γD-crystallin.
conclusionsThe study identified a novel mutation (c. 110G>C) in CRYGD associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a Chinese family. It expands the mutation spectrum of CRYGD in association with congenital cataract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21527994PMC3081795W2149215005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.