Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21527933›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2011

Stem cell self-renewal: lessons from bone marrow, gut and iPS toward clinical applications.

F J T Staal, C Baum, C Cowan, E Dzierzak, S Hacein-Bey-Abina, S Karlsson, T Lapidot, I Lemischka, S Mendez-Ferrer, H Mikkers and 9 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. First Successful Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation in Romania.Romanian journal of internal medicine = Revue roumaine de medecine interne · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Wnt signalling meets epigenetics.Stem cell investigation · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

F J T StaalDepartment of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. F.J.T.StaaL@LUMC.nl
C Baum
C Cowan
E Dzierzak
S Hacein-Bey-Abina
S Karlsson
T Lapidot
I Lemischka
S Mendez-Ferrer
H Mikkers
K Moore
E Moreno
C L Mummery
C Robin
T Suda
M Van Pel
G Vanden Brink
J J Zwaginga
W E Fibbe
Leiden University Medical Center · NLIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USBoston University · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRKeio University · JPLund University · SEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DESpanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) is the prototype organ-regenerating stem cell (SC), and by far the most studied type of SC in the body. Currently, HSC-based therapy is the only routinely used SC therapy; however, advances in the field of embryonic SCs and induced pluripotent SCs may change this situation. Interest into in vitro generation of HSCs, including signals for HSC expansion and differentiation from these more primitive SCs, as well as advances in other organ-specific SCs, in particular the intestine, provide promising new applications for SC therapies. Here, we review the basic principles of different SC systems, and on the basis of the experience with HSC-based SC therapy, provide recommendations for clinical application of emerging SC technologies.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAnimalsBone Marrow CellsClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalEmbryonic Stem CellsGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsIntestinesMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsOrgan Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21527933
OpenAlexW1964680026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.