Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21527551›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

Combinatorial binding of transcription factors in the pluripotency control regions of the genome.

Luciana Ferraris, Allan P Stewart, Jinsuk Kang, Alec M DeSimone, Matthew Gemberling, Dean Tantin, William G Fairbrother

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Homotypic cooperativity and collective binding are determinants of bHLH specificity and function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. FisherMP: fully parallel algorithm for detecting combinatorial motifs from large ChIP-seq datasets.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luciana FerrarisMolecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Allan P Stewart
Jinsuk Kang
Alec M DeSimone
Matthew Gemberling
Dean Tantin
William G Fairbrother
Brown University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Discovering and Validating Functional Elements in the GenomeR21HG004524 · NHGRI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI FAIRBROTHER, WILLIAM G · 2010 to 2011
$445k
Gene regulation of Oct1: implications of metabolism, stemness and cancerR21CA141009 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TANTIN, DEAN · 2010 to 2011
$354k
NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA141009NCI NIH HHS R21 CA141009NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG004524NHGRI NIH HHS R21HG004524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pluripotency control regions (PluCRs) are defined as genomic regions that are bound by POU5F1, SOX2, and NANOG in vivo. We utilized a high-throughput binding assay to record more than 270,000 different DNA/protein binding measurements along incrementally tiled windows of DNA within these PluCRs. This high-resolution binding map is then used to systematically define the context of POU factor binding, and reveals patterns of cooperativity and competition in the pluripotency network. The most prominent pattern is a pervasive binding competition between POU5F1 and the forkhead transcription factors. Like many transcription factors, POU5F1 is co-expressed with a paralog, POU2F1, that shares an apparently identical binding specificity. By analyzing thousands of binding measurements, we discover context effects that discriminate POU2F1 from POU5F1 binding. Proximal NANOG binding promotes POU5F1 binding, whereas nearby SOX2 binding favors POU2F1. We demonstrate by cross-species comparison and by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) that the contextual sequence determinants learned in vitro are sufficient to predict POU2F1 binding in vivo.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsBinding SitesBlotting, WesternCells, CulturedChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosome MappingElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHomeodomain ProteinsHumansOctamer Transcription Factor-1Octamer Transcription Factor-3Promoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingHomeodomain ProteinsOctamer Transcription Factor-1Octamer Transcription Factor-3SOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21527551
PMCPMC3129248
OpenAlexW2168168636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.