Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21527124›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2011

The impact of stimuli on affect in persons with dementia.

Jiska Cohen-Mansfield, Marcia S Marx, Khin Thein, Maha Dakheel-Ali

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of strategies to foster activity engagement in persons with dementia.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Feasibility, Interrater Reliability and Internal Consistency of the German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Does Social Interaction Matter Psychological Well-Being in Persons With Dementia?American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiska Cohen-MansfieldResearch Institute on Aging, Charles E. Smith Life Communities, 6121 Montrose Rd, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. cohen-mansfield@hebrew-home.org
Marcia S Marx
Khin Thein
Maha Dakheel-Ali
Institute on Aging · USTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

ENGAGEMENT OF PERSONS WITH DEMENTIAR01AG021497 · NIA · HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON · PI COHEN-MANSFIELD, JISKA · 2004 to 2006
$920k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how presentation of different stimuli impacts affect in nursing home residents with dementia.

methodParticipants were 193 residents aged 60 to 101 years from 7 Maryland nursing homes who had a diagnosis of dementia (derived from the medical chart or obtained from the attending physician). Cognitive functioning was assessed via the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and data pertaining to activities of daily living were obtained through the Minimum Data Set. Affect was assessed using observations of the 5 moods from Lawton's Modified Behavior Stream. Baseline observations of affect were performed for comparisons. During the study, each participant was presented with 25 predetermined engagement stimuli in random order over a period of 3 weeks. Stimuli were categorized as live social, simulated social, manipulative, work/task-related, music, reading, or individualized to the participant's self-identity. The dates of data collection were 2005-2007.

resultsDifferences between stimulus categories were significant for pleasure (F(6,144) = 25.137, P < .001) and interest (F(6,144) = 18.792, P < .001) but not for negative affect. Pleasure and interest were highest for the live social category, followed by self-identity and simulated social stimuli for pleasure, and for manipulative stimuli in terms of the effect on interest. The lowest levels of pleasure and interest were observed for music. Participants with higher cognitive function had significantly higher pleasure (F(1,97) = 6.27, P < .05). Although the general trend of the impact of the different categories was similar for different levels of cognitive function, there were significant differences in pleasure in response to specific stimuli (interaction effect: F(6,92) = 2.31, P < .05). Overall, social stimuli have the highest impact on affect in persons with dementia.

conclusionsThe findings of the present study are important, as affect is a major indicator of quality of life and this study is the first to systematically examine the impact of specific types of stimuli on affect. As live social stimuli are not always readily available, particularly in busy nursing home environments, simulated social stimuli can serve as an effective substitute, and other stimuli should have a role in the activity tool kit in the nursing home. The relative ranking of stimuli was different for interest and pleasure. The findings demonstrate the differential effect of presentation of different types of stimuli on the affect of persons with dementia, and that, while the impact is greater on persons with higher levels of cognitive function, there is a different effect of varying stimuli even in persons with MMSE scores of 3 or lower. Future research should attempt to ascertain a person's degree of interest in stimuli prior to developing an intervention.

Indexed as

AffectInterpersonal RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPleasureQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID21527124
PMCPMC3142768
OpenAlexW2024613152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.