Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21527107›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2011

Analysis: accuracy performance of the Medtronic NexSensor for 6 days in an inpatient setting using abdomen and buttocks insertion sites.

Mariela Glandt, Itamar Raz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariela GlandtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bronx-Lebanon Hospital, Bronx, New York 10457, USA. mglandt@gmail.com
Itamar Raz
Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center · USHadassah Academic College · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an article in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Peoples and colleagues address the issue that, while continuous glucose sensors have been shown to improve hemoglobin A1c, they are still fraught with concerns regarding accuracy and flexibility in sensor placement. Their study aimed to evaluate whether NexSensor, an improved version of the already commercially available Sof-Sensor, can be used for 6 days instead of the 3 days approved for Sof-Sensor in the United States. Also, the article aims to compare the accuracy of wearing the sensor in the abdomen versus the buttocks, given that this offers more flexibility than the approved labeling for Sof-Sensor, which is only in the abdomen. The study demonstrated that NexSensor is both safe and accurate for 6 days at both insertion sites. There was no statistically significant difference between the sites. As far as improved accuracy, the authors find evidence in favor of NexSensor as compared to Sof-Sensor, although this evidence is preliminary and is not backed by statistical significance measures.

Indexed as

AbdomenBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringButtocksFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID21527107
PMCPMC3125930
OpenAlexW2114347568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.