Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21526945›Full record

ReviewFuture microbiology2011

Current perspectives on echinocandin class drugs.

David S Perlin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Safety and efficacy of echinocandin antifungal agents inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Draft genome sequences of two clinical isolates ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Antifungal Drug Resistance.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Disruption tomSphere · 2024
    Article
  20. Comparative Analysis of Polysaccharide and Cell Wall Structure inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S PerlinPublic Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School-UMDNJ, Newark, NJ 07103, USA. perlinds@umdnj.edu
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Critical Factors Influencing Echinocandin Resistance in CandidaglabrataR01AI109025 · NIAID · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERLIN, DAVID S · 2014 to 2025
$9.8M
Mechanism of clinical resistance to echinocandin antifungal drugsR01AI069397 · NIAID · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERLIN, DAVID S · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
Rapid Evaluation of Drug Resistance in Pathogenic FungiR21AI055767 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PERLIN, DAVID S · 2003 to 2004
$485k
NIAID NIH HHS AI069397NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069397NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI109025NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI055767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been nearly a decade since caspofungin was approved for clinical use as the first echinocandin class antifungal agent, followed by micafungin and anidulafungin. The echinocandin drugs target the fungal cell wall by inhibiting the synthesis of β-1,3-D-glucan, a critical cell wall component of many pathogenic fungi. They are fungicidal for Candida spp. and fungistatic for moulds, such as Aspergillus fumigatus, where they induce abnormal morphology and growth properties. The echinocandins have a limited antifungal spectrum but are highly active against most Candida spp., including azole-resistant strains and biofilms. As they target glucan synthase, an enzyme absent in mammalian cells, the echinocandins have a favorable safety profile. They show potent MIC and epidemiological cutoff values against susceptible Candida and Aspergillus isolates, and the frequency of resistance is low. When clinical breakthrough occurs, it is associated with high MIC values and mutations in Fks subunits of glucan synthase, which can reduce the sensitivity of the enzyme to the drug by several thousand-fold. Such strains were not adequately captured by an early clinical breakpoint for susceptibility prompting a revised lower value, which addresses the FKS resistance mechanism and new pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies. Elevated MIC values unlinked to therapeutic failure can occur and result from adaptive cell behavior, which is FKS-independent and involves the molecular chaperone Hsp90 and the calcineurin pathway. Mutations in FKS1 and/or FKS2 alter the kinetic properties of glucan synthase, which reduces the relative fitness of mutant strains causing them to be less pathogenic. The echinocandin drugs also modify the cell wall architecture exposing buried glucans, which in turn induce a variety of important host immune responses. Finally, the future for glucan synthase inhibitors looks bright with the development of new orally active compounds.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsEchinocandinsAspergillusCandidaDrug Resistance, FungalGlucosyltransferasesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsglucan synthaseGlucosyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID21526945
PMCPMC3913534
OpenAlexW2148709825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.