Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21526232›Full record

ReviewPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2011

Multiscale modeling of biological functions.

Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin, Arieh Warshel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conductance selectivity of NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Enhancing Paradynamics for QM/MM Sampling of Enzymatic Reactions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The power of coarse graining in biomolecular simulations.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science · 2014
    Article
  15. Recent advances in transferable coarse-grained modeling of proteins.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Why nature really chose phosphate.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shina Caroline Lynn KamerlinDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Stockholm University, S-10691, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arieh Warshel

Funding

Mechanistic Analysis of Pol Beta and Cancer-Associated MutantsU19CA105010 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOODMAN, MYRON · 2004 to 2012
$9.8M
THEORETICAL STUDIES OF ENZYMATIC REACTIONSR01GM024492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WARSHEL, ARIEH · 1985 to 2017
$5.0M
COMPUTER SIMULATION OF ELECTRON TRANSFER REACTIONSR01GM040283 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WARSHEL, ARIEH · 1988 to 2016
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1 U19 CA105010-1NCI NIH HHS U19 CA105010NIGMS NIH HHS GM24492NIGMS NIH HHS GM40283NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM024492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a tremendous explosion in computational power, which in turn has resulted in great progress in the complexity of the biological and chemical problems that can be addressed by means of all-atom simulations. Despite this, however, our computational time is not infinite, and in fact many of the key problems of the field were resolved long before the existence of the current levels of computational power. This review will start by presenting a brief historical overview of the use of multiscale simulations in biology, and then present some key developments in the field, highlighting several cases where the use of a physically sound simplification is clearly superior to a brute-force approach. Finally, some potential future directions will be discussed.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalComputer SimulationQuantum TheoryThermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID21526232
PMCPMC3102780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.