ArticleBiomicrofluidics2011
Computational design optimization for microfluidic magnetophoresis.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning for microfluidic design and control.Lab on a chip · 2022Review
- Recovery of Magnetic Catalysts: Advanced Design for Process Intensification.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2021Article
- Progress of Microfluidic Continuous Separation Techniques for Micro-/Nanoscale Bioparticles.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Continuous-Flow Separation of Magnetic Particles from Biofluids: How Does the Microdevice Geometry Determine the Separation Performance?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Dielectric Characterization and Separation Optimization of Infiltrating Ductal Adenocarcinoma via Insulator-Dielectrophoresis.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Magnetic Trapping of Bacteria at Low Magnetic Fields.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Multiphase ferrofluid flows for micro-particle focusing and separation.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Geometrical optimization of microstripe arrays for microbead magnetophoresis.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
- Simultaneous diamagnetic and magnetic particle trapping in ferrofluid microflows via a single permanent magnet.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
- An Integrated Platform for Isolation, Processing, and Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomic Profiling of Rare Cells in Whole Blood.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Fundamentals and application of magnetic particles in cell isolation and enrichment: a review.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2015Review
- Perspective on microfluidic cell separation: a solved problem?Analytical chemistry · 2014Review
- Magnetophoretic manipulation in microsystem using carbonyl iron-polydimethylsiloxane microstructures.Biomicrofluidics · 2014Article
- Inertial focusing for tumor antigen-dependent and -independent sorting of rare circulating tumor cells.Science translational medicine · 2013Article
- Enrichment of live unlabelled cardiomyocytes from heterogeneous cell populations using manipulation of cell settling velocity by magnetic field.Biomicrofluidics · 2013Article
- Microfluidic immunomagnetic cell separation using integrated permanent micromagnets.Biomicrofluidics · 2013Article
- Size-based hydrodynamic rare tumor cell separation in curved microfluidic channels.Biomicrofluidics · 2013Article
- Simulation guided design of a microfluidic device for electrophoretic stretching of DNA.Biomicrofluidics · 2012Article
- Three-dimensional diamagnetic particle deflection in ferrofluid microchannel flows.Biomicrofluidics · 2011Article
- Preface to Special Topic: Biological microfluidics in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Biomicrofluidics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current macro- and microfluidic approaches for the isolation of mammalian cells are limited in both efficiency and purity. In order to design a robust platform for the enumeration of a target cell population, high collection efficiencies are required. Additionally, the ability to isolate pure populations with minimal biological perturbation and efficient off-chip recovery will enable subcellular analyses of these cells for applications in personalized medicine. Here, a rational design approach for a simple and efficient device that isolates target cell populations via magnetic tagging is presented. In this work, two magnetophoretic microfluidic device designs are described, with optimized dimensions and operating conditions determined from a force balance equation that considers two dominant and opposing driving forces exerted on a magnetic-particle-tagged cell, namely, magnetic and viscous drag. Quantitative design criteria for an electromagnetic field displacement-based approach are presented, wherein target cells labeled with commercial magnetic microparticles flowing in a central sample stream are shifted laterally into a collection stream. Furthermore, the final device design is constrained to fit on standard rectangular glass coverslip (60 (L)×24 (W)×0.15 (H) mm(3)) to accommodate small sample volume and point-of-care design considerations. The anticipated performance of the device is examined via a parametric analysis of several key variables within the model. It is observed that minimal currents (<500 mA) are required to generate magnetic fields sufficient to separate cells from the sample streams flowing at rate as high as 7 ml∕h, comparable to the performance of current state-of-the-art magnet-activated cell sorting systems currently used in clinical settings. Experimental validation of the presented model illustrates that a device designed according to the derived rational optimization can effectively isolate (∼100%) a magnetic-particle-tagged cell population from a homogeneous suspension even in a low abundance. Overall, this design analysis provides a rational basis to select the operating conditions, including chamber and wire geometry, flow rates, and applied currents, for a magnetic-microfluidic cell separation device.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.