Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21525367›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2011

Inhibition in the balance: binaurally coupled inhibitory feedback in sound localization circuitry.

R Michael Burger, Iwao Fukui, Harunori Ohmori, Edwin W Rubel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Nucleus Laminaris of the Barn Owl.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Michael BurgerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, USA. burger@lehigh.edu
Iwao Fukui
Harunori Ohmori
Edwin W Rubel

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC004661 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W, STONE, JENNIFER S. · 2000 to 2014
$11.1M
Motley Diversity SupplementR01DC003829 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RUBEL, EDWIN W · 1999 to 2014
$6.0M
Efferent inhibitory mechanisms in binaural processingR01DC008989 · NIDCD · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI BURGER, R. MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-008989NIDCD NIH HHS DC-03829NIDCD NIH HHS DC-04661NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the primary cue animals, including humans, use to localize low-frequency sounds. In vertebrate auditory systems, dedicated ITD processing neural circuitry performs an exacting task, the discrimination of microsecond differences in stimulus arrival time at the two ears by coincidence-detecting neurons. These neurons modulate responses over their entire dynamic range to sounds differing in ITD by mere hundreds of microseconds. The well-understood function of this circuitry in birds has provided a fruitful system to investigate how inhibition contributes to neural computation at the synaptic, cellular, and systems level. Our recent studies in the chicken have made significant progress in bringing together many of these findings to provide a cohesive picture of inhibitory function.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysBirdsBrain StemFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansNeuronsSound Localization

Identifiers

PMID21525367
PMCPMC3129726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.