Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21525213›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Valérie Lalande, Laurence Barrault, Sophie Wadel, Catherine Eckert, Jean-Claude Petit, Frédéric Barbut

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid and fully-automated detection ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comprehensive evaluation of chemiluminescent immunoassays for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valérie LalandeNational Reference Laboratory for Clostridium Difficile, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Site Saint-Antoine, 27 rue de Chaligny, 75012 Paris, France. valerie.lalande@sat.aphp.fr
Laurence Barrault
Sophie Wadel
Catherine Eckert
Jean-Claude Petit
Frédéric Barbut

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new assay (illumigene C. difficile; Meridian Bioscience), based on the original loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, was evaluated with 472 unformed stools from patients suspected of Clostridium difficile infection. Compared to the toxigenic culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 91.8, 99.1, 91.8, and 99.1% for the illumigene C. difficile assay and 69.4, 100, 100, and 96.6% for the cytotoxicity assay, respectively.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsFecesHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityTemperature

Identifiers

PMID21525213
PMCPMC3147856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.