Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21524904›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2011

Bottom-up tissue engineering.

Donald L Elbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advanced Hydrogels in Breast Cancer Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Silk-Based Materials for Hard Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Donald L ElbertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Materials Innovation, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. elbert@biomed.wustl.edu

Funding

Development of materials to release bioactive lipidsR01HL085364 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELBERT, DONALD L · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085364NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL085364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recapitulating the elegant structures formed during development is an extreme synthetic and biological challenge. Great progress has been made in developing materials to support transplanted cells, yet the complexity of tissues is far beyond that found in even the most advanced scaffolds. Self-assembly is a motif used in development and a route for the production of complex materials. Self-assembly of peptides, proteins and other molecules at the nanoscale is promising, but in addition, intriguing ideas are emerging for self-assembly of micron-scale structures. In this brief review, very recent advances in the assembly of micron-scale cell aggregates and microgels will be described and discussed.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringAnimalsCell AggregationHumansHydrogelsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID21524904
PMCPMC3153565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.