SynthesisBMC medicine2011
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
158 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementation costs of hospital-based computerised decision support systems: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2023Pooled it
- Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Pooled it
- Indicators of home-based hospitalization model and strategies for its implementation: a systematic review of reviews.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses' time.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Pooled it
- Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Pooled it
- Strategies for improving physician documentation in the emergency department: a systematic review.BMC emergency medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Access barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa-a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: Results of an Overview of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update).Implementation science : IS · 2016Pooled it
- m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Pooled it
- Success criteria for electronic medical record implementations in low-resource settings: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Pooled it
- Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2014Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups' perceptions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAPooled it
- Electronic Health Record Documentation Times among Emergency Medicine Trainees.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2019Trial
- Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Trial
- Early Implementation of a Nationwide Opt-Out Electronic Health Record for Outpatient Care in Germany: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Digital Hesitancy Among Nurses and Physicians in Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Cross-Sectional Study from Romania.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Factors associated with digital tools use among primary healthcare professionals in Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study of the minimal digital ecosystem.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Privacy concerns regarding personal health information in Myanmar: A cross-sectional survey in a least developed country.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Article
98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectronic health record (EHR) implementation is currently underway in Canada, as in many other countries. These ambitious projects involve many stakeholders with unique perceptions of the implementation process. EHR users have an important role to play as they must integrate the EHR system into their work environments and use it in their everyday activities. Users hold valuable, first-hand knowledge of what can limit or contribute to the success of EHR implementation projects. A comprehensive synthesis of EHR users' perceptions is key to successful future implementation. This systematic literature review was aimed to synthesize current knowledge of the barriers and facilitators influencing shared EHR implementation among its various users.
methodsCovering a period from 1999 to 2009, a literature search was conducted on nine electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on users' perceived barriers and facilitators to shared EHR implementation, in healthcare settings comparable to Canada. Studies in all languages with an empirical study design were included. Quality and relevance of the studies were assessed. Four EHR user groups were targeted: physicians, other health care professionals, managers, and patients/public. Content analysis was performed independently by two authors using a validated extraction grid with pre-established categorization of barriers and facilitators for each group of EHR users.
resultsOf a total of 5,695 potentially relevant publications identified, 117 full text publications were obtained after screening titles and abstracts. After review of the full articles, 60 publications, corresponding to 52 studies, met the inclusion criteria. The most frequent adoption factors common to all user groups were design and technical concerns, ease of use, interoperability, privacy and security, costs, productivity, familiarity and ability with EHR, motivation to use EHR, patient and health professional interaction, and lack of time and workload. Each user group also identified factors specific to their professional and individual priorities.
conclusionsThis systematic review presents innovative research on the barriers and facilitators to EHR implementation. While important similarities between user groups are highlighted, differences between them demonstrate that each user group also has a unique perspective of the implementation process that should be taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.