Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21522167›Full record

ArticleHeredity2011

Demographic and genetic factors shaping contemporary metapopulation effective size and its empirical estimation in salmonid fish.

F P Palstra, D E Ruzzante

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Keeping things local: SubpopulationEvolutionary applications · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F P PalstraBiology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. palstra@mnhn.fr
D E Ruzzante
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservation of biodiversity requires an understanding of the maintenance of its components, including genetic diversity. Effective population size determines the amount of genetic variance maintained in populations, but its estimation can be complex, especially when populations are interconnected in a metapopulation. Theory predicts that the effective size of a metapopulation (meta-N(e)) can be decreased or increased by population subdivision, but little empirical work has evaluated these predictions. Here, we use neutral genetic markers and simulations to estimate the effective size of a putative metapopulation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). For a weakly structured set of rivers, we find that meta-N(e) is similar to the sum of local deme sizes, whereas higher genetic differentiation among demes dramatically reduces meta-N(e) estimates. Interdemic demographic processes, such as asymmetrical gene flow, may explain this pattern. However, simulations also suggest that unrecognized population subdivision can also introduce downward bias into empirical estimation, emphasizing the importance of identifying the proper scale of distinct demographic and genetic processes. Under natural patterns of connectivity, evolutionary potential may generally be maintained at higher levels than the local population, with implications for conservation given ongoing species declines and habitat fragmentation.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, GeneticAnimalsEmpirical ResearchFemaleGene FlowLinkage DisequilibriumMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsNewfoundland and LabradorPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsRiversSalmo salar

Identifiers

PMID21522167
PMCPMC3199926
OpenAlexW1967551683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.