Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21521791›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Dynamic programming procedure for searching optimal models to estimate substitution rates based on the maximum-likelihood method.

Chengjun Zhang, Jia Wang, Weibo Xie, Gang Zhou, Manyuan Long, Qifa Zhang

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TheFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  5. Comparative analysis ofData in brief · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative Analysis ofVeterinary sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chengjun ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research Wuhan, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jia Wang
Weibo Xie
Gang Zhou
Manyuan Long
Qifa Zhang

Funding

Detection of Distribution of New Genes in Drosophila PhylogenyR01GM078070 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LONG, MANYUAN · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078070PHS HHS R0IGM078070-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The substitution rate in a gene can provide valuable information for understanding its functionality and evolution. A widely used method to estimate substitution rates is the maximum-likelihood method implemented in the CODEML program in the PAML package. A limited number of branch models, chosen based on a priori information or an interest in a particular lineage(s), are tested, whereas a large number of potential models are neglected. A complementary approach is also needed to test all or a large number of possible models to search for the globally optional model(s) of maximum likelihood. However, the computational time for this search even in a small number of sequences becomes impractically long. Thus, it is desirable to explore the most probable spaces to search for the optimal models. Using dynamic programming techniques, we developed a simple computational method for searching the most probable optimal branch-specific models in a practically feasible computational time. We propose three search methods to find the optimal models, which explored O(n) (method 1) to O(n(2)) (method 2 and method 3) models when the given phylogeny has n branches. In addition, we derived a formula to calculate the number of all possible models, revealing the complexity of finding the optimal branch-specific model. We show that in a reanalysis of over 50 previously published studies, the vast majority obtained better models with significantly higher likelihoods than the conventional hypothesis model methods.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsDatabases, GeneticLikelihood FunctionsMuramidasePhylogenyPrimatesSelection, GeneticMuramidase

Identifiers

PMID21521791
PMCPMC3093512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.