Cancer computational biology.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Making Sense of Genetic Information: The Promising Evolution of Clinical Stratification and Precision Oncology Using Machine Learning.Genes · 2021
   Review
2. In silico prediction of potential miRNA-disease association using an integrative bioinformatics approach based on kernel fusion.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
   Article
3. Review: Precision medicine and driver mutations: Computational methods, functional assays and conformational principles for interpreting cancer drivers.PLoS computational biology · 2019
   Review
4. Precision medicine review: rare driver mutations and their biophysical classification.Biophysical reviews · 2019
   Review
5. Computational analyses for cancer biology based on exhaustive experimental backgrounds.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019
   Review
6. Uncover miRNA-Disease Association by Exploiting Global Network Similarity.PloS one · 2016
   Article
7. The structural basis for cancer treatment decisions.Oncotarget · 2014
   Review
8. Prediction of microRNAs associated with human diseases based on weighted k most similar neighbors.PloS one · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as