Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21521426›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2012

Behavioral profiling of multiple pairs of rats selectively bred for high and low alcohol intake using the MCSF test.

Erika Roman, Robert B Stewart, Megan L Bertholomey, Meredith L Jensen, Giancarlo Colombo, Petri Hyytiä, Nancy E Badia-Elder, Nicholas J Grahame, Ting-Kai Li, Lawrence Lumeng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Behavioral Phenotyping for Down Syndrome in Mice.Current protocols in mouse biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Erika RomanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Sweden. erika.roman@farmbio.uu.se
Robert B Stewart
Megan L Bertholomey
Meredith L Jensen
Giancarlo Colombo
Petri Hyytiä
Nancy E Badia-Elder
Nicholas J Grahame
Ting-Kai Li
Lawrence Lumeng
University of Indianapolis · USDuke Medical Center · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DAVID A. KAREKEN · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
TRAINING GRANT ON GENETICS ASPECTS OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007462 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CRISTINE L CZACHOWSKI · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
Rodents with Genetic Differences in Alcohol PreferenceR24AA015512 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BELL, RICHARD LOWELL · 2005 to 2014
$5.1M
Rodents with Genetic Differences in Alcohol PreferenceU24AA015512 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BELL, RICHARD LOWELL · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA015512NIAAA NIH HHS AA07462NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA015512NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007462NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA015512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic aspects of alcoholism have been modeled using rats selectively bred for extremes of alcohol preference and voluntary alcohol intake. These lines show similar alcohol drinking phenotypes but have different genetic and environmental backgrounds and may therefore display diverse behavioral traits as seen in human alcoholics. The multivariate concentric square field™ (MCSF) test is designed to provoke exploration and behaviors associated with risk assessment, risk taking and shelter seeking in a novel environment. The aim was to use the MCSF to characterize behavioral profiles in rat lines from selective breeding programs in the United States (P/NP, HAD1/LAD1, HAD2/LAD2), Italy (sP/sNP) and Finland (AA/ANA). The open field and elevated plus maze tests were used as reference tests. There were substantial differences within some of the pairs of selectively bred rat lines as well as between all alcohol-preferring rats. The most pronounced differences within the pairs of lines were between AA and ANA rats and between sP and sNP rats followed by intermediate differences between P and NP rats and minor differences comparing HAD and LAD rats. Among all preferring lines, P, HAD1 and HAD2 rats shared similar behavioral profiles, while AA and sP rats were quite different from each other and the others. No single trait appeared to form a common 'pathway' associated with a high alcohol drinking phenotype among all of the alcohol-preferring lines of rats. The marked behavioral differences found in the different alcohol-preferring lines may mimic the heterogeneity observed among human alcoholic subtypes.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismAnimalsAnxietyChoice BehaviorDisease Models, AnimalExploratory BehaviorImpulsive BehaviorMaleMaze LearningNeuropsychological TestsRatsRats, WistarRisk-TakingSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21521426
PMCPMC5472351
OpenAlexW1596152985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.