Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21518837›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral linezolid in adults with cystic fibrosis.

Rebecca A Keel, Andre Schaeftlein, Charlotte Kloft, J Samuel Pope, R Frederic Knauft, Marianne Muhlebach, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Prophylactic anti-staphylococcal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Prophylactic anti-staphylococcal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Proposed Linezolid Dosing Strategies to Minimize Adverse Events for Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. [Pharmacokinetic interaction between linezolid and rifampicin: A case report].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca A KeelCenter for Anti-Infective Research & Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut 06102, USA.
Andre Schaeftlein
Charlotte Kloft
J Samuel Pope
R Frederic Knauft
Marianne Muhlebach
David P Nicolau
Joseph L Kuti
Hartford Hospital · USMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linezolid is a treatment option for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Little is known, however, about its pharmacokinetics in this population. Eight adults with CF were randomized to receive intravenous (i.v.) and oral linezolid at 600 mg twice daily for 9 doses in a crossover design with a 9-day washout. Plasma samples were collected after the first and ninth doses of each phase. Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling using a previously described 2-compartment model with time-dependent clearance inhibition. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to assess the activities of the linezolid dosing regimens against 42 contemporary MRSA isolates recovered from CF patients. The following pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were observed for the population: absorption rate constant, 1.91 h(-1); clearance, 9.54 liters/h; volume of central compartment, 26.8 liters; volume of peripheral compartment, 17.3 liters; and intercompartmental clearance, 104 liters/h. Linezolid demonstrated nonlinear clearance after 9 doses, which was reduced by a mean of 38.9% (range, 28.8 to 59.9%). Mean bioavailability was 85% (range, 47 to 131%). At steady state, 600 mg given twice daily produced 93.0% and 87.2% probabilities of obtaining the target pharmacodynamic exposure against the MRSA isolates for the i.v. and oral formulations, respectively. Thrice-daily dosing increased the probabilities to 97.0% and 95.6%, respectively. Linezolid pharmacokinetics in these adults with CF were well described by a 2-compartment model with time-dependent clearance inhibition. Standard i.v. and oral dosing regimens should be sufficient to reliably attain pharmacodynamic targets against most MRSA isolates; however, more frequent dosing may be required for isolates with MICs of ≥ 2 μg/ml.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAdministration, OralAdultAnti-Infective AgentsCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousLinezolidMaleModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodOxazolidinonesYoung AdultAcetamidesAnti-Infective AgentsLinezolidOxazolidinones

Identifiers

PMID21518837
PMCPMC3122391
OpenAlexW2152207716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.