Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21518387›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2011

Drug selection in French university hospitals: analysis of formularies for nine competitive pharmacological classes.

Adeline Gallini, Blandine Juillard-Condat, Marie-Claude Saux, Florence Taboulet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adeline GalliniINSERM, UMR 1027 Epidémiologie et analyses en santé publique: risques, maladies chroniques et handicaps Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse 3, France. adeline.gallini@gmail.com
Blandine Juillard-Condat
Marie-Claude Saux
Florence Taboulet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo give a panorama of the selectivity and agreement of French university hospitals' drug formularies (HDF) for nine competitive classes.

methodsAll university hospitals were asked to send their HDF and selection criteria as of January 2009 for nine competitive pharmacological classes (proton pump inhibitors, serotonin antagonists, low molecular weight heparins, erythropoietins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, statins, α-adrenoreceptor antagonists and selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors). Selectivity of HDF was estimated by the percentage of drug entities selected by the hospital within the pharmacological class. Agreement between hospitals was assessed with modified kappa coefficients for multi-raters.

resultsTwenty-one out of the 29 hospitals agreed to participate. These hospitals selected between 34% and 63% of the drug entities available for the nine classes, which represented 18 to 35 agents. Regarding the nature of chosen drug entities, the overall level of agreement was 'fair' and varied with pharmacological classes. Selection criteria were sent by only 12 hospitals. The technical component was the most important element in all hospitals. The weight of the economic component varied between 20% and 40% in the tender's grade. DISCUSSION: Large variations were seen in the number and nature of drugs selected by university hospitals which can be attributable to two successive decision-making processes (evaluation by the Drug and Therapeutics Committee followed by the purchasing process).

Indexed as

Formularies, Hospital as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationFranceHospitals, UniversityHumansPharmacy Service, HospitalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21518387
PMCPMC3243016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.