Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21518317›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2011

Who should have knee joint replacement surgery for osteoarthritis?

Paul Dieppe, Keith Lim, Stefan Lohmander

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02861794 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Early Migration of Medially Stabilized Arthroplasty as a Predictor of Long Time Survivorship (Implant Design Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2016 to 2024Enrolled44ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsMedacta International, GMK Sphere medially stabilized knee
NCT02965690 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of in Vivo Kinematics of Different Implants in ACL-sacrificing vs. Medially Stabilized Arthroplasty (Implant Design Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2016 to 2025Enrolled26ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsZimmer Biomet NexGen CR, Medacta International GMK Sphere
NCT04017533 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

In Vivo Stability of an Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty With Medially Stabilized Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled31ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsGMK Sphere TKR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul DieppeClinical Education Research, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK. pchoong@unimelb.edu.au
Keith Lim
Stefan Lohmander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee joint replacement is an effective and cost-effective intervention for severe symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, utilisation rates vary hugely, there are no indications, it is difficult to know when (in the course of arthritis) it is best to operate, and some 10-20% of people who have this surgery are unhappy with the outcome, and have persistent pain. In this article we briefly discuss the variations in utilization of knee joint replacement, and then outline four different approaches to the selection and prioritisation of patients for this procedure. Consensus criteria, including appropriateness criteria are available, but if produced by professionals alone, they may conflict with the views of patients and the public. Databases and cohort studies can be used to attempt relating outcomes to baseline characteristics, but at present we can only account for a small percentage of the variance with this technique. Finally, we propose use of the 'capacity to benefit framework' to attempt providing guidance to both patients and healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEvidence-Based MedicineHumansKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneePatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.