Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21517933›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral rehabilitation2011

Changes in health complaints after removal of amalgam fillings.

T T Sjursen, G B Lygre, K Dalen, V Helland, T Laegreid, J Svahn, B F Lundekvam, L Björkman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00346944 (Health Effects From Removal of Amalgam Restorations in Patients With Symptoms Allegedly Related to Dental Amalgam - A Study of Patients Examined at the Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit in 1993 to 1999), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00346944 phase4completednot on this map

Health Effects From Removal of Amalgam Restorations in Patients With Symptoms Allegedly Related to Dental Amalgam - A Study of Patients Examined at the Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit in 1993 to 1999

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2002 to 2010Enrolled50ConditionsAdverse Effects, Dental Restoration, PermanentArmsRemoval of dental amalgam restorations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patients' experiences of changes in health complaints before, during, and after removal of dental amalgam.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A safe protocol for amalgam removal.Journal of environmental and public health · 2012
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T T SjursenDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
G B Lygre
K Dalen
V Helland
T Laegreid
J Svahn
B F Lundekvam
L Björkman
University of Bergen · NOMaterials Research Group (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether removal of all amalgam fillings was associated with long-term changes in health complaints in a group of patients who attributed subjective health complaints to amalgam fillings. Patients previously examined at the Norwegian Dental Biomaterials Adverse Reaction Unit were included in the study and assigned to a treatment group (n = 20) and a reference group (n = 20). Participants in the treatment group had all amalgam fillings replaced with other restorative materials. Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 3 years after removal of all amalgam fillings. There was no intervention in the reference group. Subjective health complaints were measured by numeric rating scales in both groups. Analysis of covariance was used to compare changes in health complaints over time in the two groups. In the treatment group, there were significant reductions in intra-oral and general health complaints from inclusion into study to the 3-year follow-up. In the reference group, changes in the same period were not significant. Comparisons between the groups showed that reductions in intra-oral and general health complaints in the treatment group were significantly different from the changes in the reference group. The mechanisms behind this remain to be identified. Reduced exposure to dental amalgam, patient-centred treatment and follow-ups, and elimination of worry are factors that may have influenced the results.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesDental AmalgamDental Restoration, PermanentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient SatisfactionDental Amalgam

Identifiers

PMID21517933
PMCPMC3229679
OpenAlexW1916950863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.