ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2011
Hotline update of clinical trials and registries presented at the American College of Cardiology Congress 2011.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Versus Mitral-valve Surgery in Elderly Patients With Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014Article
- Rapid pacing facilitates grasping and MitraClip implantation in severe mitral leaflet prolapse.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012Article
- Hotline update of clinical trials and registries presented at the 77th spring meeting of the German Society of Cardiology 2011.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article provides information and commentaries on trials which were presented at the Hotline and Clinical Trial Update Sessions during the Late Breaking Clinical Trial Sessions at the 60th annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in New Orleans, USA, from 2nd April to 5th April 2011. This article gives an overview on a number of novel clinical trials in the field of cardiovascular medicine, which were presented. The comprehensive summaries have been generated from the oral presentation and the webcasts of the American College of Cardiology, similar as previously reported (Gensch et al. Clin Res Cardiol 100:1-9, 2011; Lenski et al. Clin Res Cardiol 99:679-692, 2010) and should provide the readers with the most comprehensive information of relevant publications. The data were presented by leading experts in the field with relevant positions in the trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21516320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.