Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21516116›Full record

ArticleNature methods2011

Next-generation sequencing to generate interactome datasets.

Haiyuan Yu, Leah Tardivo, Stanley Tam, Evan Weiner, Fana Gebreab, Changyu Fan, Nenad Svrzikapa, Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa, Edward Rietman, Xinping Yang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. In vivo versus in silico assessment of potentially pathogenic missense variants in human reproductive genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Haiyuan YuCenter for Cancer Systems Biology, Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Leah Tardivo
Stanley Tam
Evan Weiner
Fana Gebreab
Changyu Fan
Nenad Svrzikapa
Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa
Edward Rietman
Xinping Yang
Julie Sahalie
Kourosh Salehi-Ashtiani
Tong Hao
Michael E Cusick
David E Hill
Frederick P Roth
Pascal Braun
Marc Vidal

Funding

The C. elegans Interactome ProjectR01HG001715 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HILL, DAVID E., ROTH, FREDERICK P · 1998 to 2010
$16.5M
Technology for large-scale genetic interaction discovery in S. cerevisiaeR21HG004756 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ROTH, FREDERICK P · 2008 to 2009
$466k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001715NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG004756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has not been applied to protein-protein interactome network mapping so far because the association between the members of each interacting pair would not be maintained in en masse sequencing. We describe a massively parallel interactome-mapping pipeline, Stitch-seq, that combines PCR stitching with next-generation sequencing and used it to generate a new human interactome dataset. Stitch-seq is applicable to various interaction assays and should help expand interactome network mapping.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinHumansOpen Reading FramesPolymerase Chain ReactionProtein Interaction MappingSequence Analysis, DNATwo-Hybrid System Techniques

Identifiers

PMID21516116
PMCPMC3188388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.