Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21516038›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2011

Understanding the potential role of statins in pneumonia and sepsis.

Sachin Yende, Eric B Milbrandt, John A Kellum, Lan Kong, Russell L Delude, Lisa A Weissfeld, Derek C Angus

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sachin YendeCRISMA Laboratory (Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. yendes@upmc.edu
Eric B Milbrandt
John A Kellum
Lan Kong
Russell L Delude
Lisa A Weissfeld
Derek C Angus
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Genetic And Inflammatory Markers Of SepsisR01GM061992 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ANGUS, DEREK C · 2001 to 2004
$6.0M
Mechanical Ventilation and DeliriumK23HL078760 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MILBRANDT, ERIC B. · 2005 to 2009
$729k
Predicting Risk of Pneumonia in the General PopulationK23GM083215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YENDE, SACHIN · 2008 to 2012
$597k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL078760NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL078760NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM083215NIGMS NIH HHS K23GM083215NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061992NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM61992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association of statin use with clinical outcomes and circulating biomarkers in community-acquired pneumonia and sepsis.

designMulticenter inception cohort study.

settingEmergency departments of 28 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 1895 subjects hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOur approach consisted of two different comparison cohorts, each reflecting methods used in prior publications in this area. We first compared subjects with prior statin use (prior use cohort), defined as a history of statin use in the week before admission, with those with no prior use. We then compared prior statin users whose statins were continued inhospital (continued use cohort) with those with either no prior use or no inhospital use. We adjusted for patient characteristics, including demographics, comorbid conditions, and illness severity, and accounted for healthy user effect and indication bias using propensity analysis. We determined risk of severe sepsis and 90-day mortality. We measured markers inflammation (tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, interleukin-10), coagulation (antithrombin, factor IX, plasminogen activator inhibitor, d-dimer, thrombin antithrombin complex), and lymphocyte cell surface protein expression during the first week of hospitalization. There were no differences in severe sepsis risk between statin users and nonusers for prior (30.8% vs. 30.7%, p = .98) or continued statin use (30.2% vs. 30.8%, p = .85) in univariate analyses and after adjusting for patient characteristics and propensity for statin use. Ninety-day mortality was similar in prior statin users (9.2% vs. 12.0%, p = .11) and lower in continued statin users (7.9% vs. 12.1%, p = .02). After adjusting for patient characteristics and propensity for statin use, there was no mortality benefit for prior (odds ratio, 0.90 [0.63-1.29]; p = .57) or continued statin use (odds ratio, 0.73 [0.47-1.13]; p = .15). Only antithrombin activity over time was higher in statin subjects, yet the magnitude of the difference was modest. There were no differences in other coagulation, inflammatory, or lymphocyte cell surface markers.

conclusionsWe found no evidence of a protective effect for statin use on clinical outcomes and only modest differences in circulating biomarkers in community-acquired pneumonia, perhaps as a result of healthy user effects and indication bias.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesCommunity-Acquired InfectionsConfidence IntervalsCritical CareCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital MortalityHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21516038
PMCPMC3139804
OpenAlexW1987612522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.