ArticleCritical care medicine2011
Understanding the potential role of statins in pneumonia and sepsis.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of statin therapy on mortality from infection and sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Pooled it
- The role of statins in prevention and treatment of community acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Statins and associated risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between outpatient statins use and infectious disease-related mortality.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- Statins and prevention of infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from large randomised placebo controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011 · on this mapPooled it
- Impact of prior statin use on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: data from tertiary referral hospitals during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.Journal of clinical lipidologyTrial
- Article
- The Association Between Statin Therapy and the Subsequent Clinical Course of Patients With Melioidosis.Journal of tropical medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of Statins and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors on IL-6 Levels in COVID-19 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Protective Effects of Different Classes, Intensity, Cumulative Dose-Dependent of Statins Against Primary Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- Optimal statin use for prevention of sepsis in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Article
- Phenotypical and Functional Alteration of γδ T Lymphocytes in COVID-19 Patients: Reversal by Statins.Cells · 2022Article
- Association between antecedent statin use and decreased mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Confronting the threat of SARS-CoV-2: Realities, challenges and therapeutic strategies (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors: What is their role in coronavirus disease 2019?Medical hypotheses · 2021Review
- The anti-tubercular activity of simvastatin is mediated by cholesterol-driven autophagy via the AMPK-mTORC1-TFEB axis.Journal of lipid research · 2020Article
- Managing hyperlipidaemia in patients with COVID-19 and during its pandemic: An expert panel position statement from HEART UK.Atherosclerosis · 2020Review
- Statin Use Is Associated with Decreased Risk of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 Patients: A Preliminary Study.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Association Between Antecedent Statin Use and Decreased Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.Research square · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the association of statin use with clinical outcomes and circulating biomarkers in community-acquired pneumonia and sepsis.
designMulticenter inception cohort study.
settingEmergency departments of 28 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 1895 subjects hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsOur approach consisted of two different comparison cohorts, each reflecting methods used in prior publications in this area. We first compared subjects with prior statin use (prior use cohort), defined as a history of statin use in the week before admission, with those with no prior use. We then compared prior statin users whose statins were continued inhospital (continued use cohort) with those with either no prior use or no inhospital use. We adjusted for patient characteristics, including demographics, comorbid conditions, and illness severity, and accounted for healthy user effect and indication bias using propensity analysis. We determined risk of severe sepsis and 90-day mortality. We measured markers inflammation (tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, interleukin-10), coagulation (antithrombin, factor IX, plasminogen activator inhibitor, d-dimer, thrombin antithrombin complex), and lymphocyte cell surface protein expression during the first week of hospitalization. There were no differences in severe sepsis risk between statin users and nonusers for prior (30.8% vs. 30.7%, p = .98) or continued statin use (30.2% vs. 30.8%, p = .85) in univariate analyses and after adjusting for patient characteristics and propensity for statin use. Ninety-day mortality was similar in prior statin users (9.2% vs. 12.0%, p = .11) and lower in continued statin users (7.9% vs. 12.1%, p = .02). After adjusting for patient characteristics and propensity for statin use, there was no mortality benefit for prior (odds ratio, 0.90 [0.63-1.29]; p = .57) or continued statin use (odds ratio, 0.73 [0.47-1.13]; p = .15). Only antithrombin activity over time was higher in statin subjects, yet the magnitude of the difference was modest. There were no differences in other coagulation, inflammatory, or lymphocyte cell surface markers.
conclusionsWe found no evidence of a protective effect for statin use on clinical outcomes and only modest differences in circulating biomarkers in community-acquired pneumonia, perhaps as a result of healthy user effects and indication bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.