Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21515776›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2011

Cellular stoichiometry of the chemotaxis proteins in Bacillus subtilis.

Vincent J Cannistraro, George D Glekas, Christopher V Rao, George W Ordal

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct roles of PilI and ChpC inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. TheJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Role of a single MCP in evolutionary adaptation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Baseplate variability ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanism and Role of Globin-Coupled Sensor Signalling.Advances in microbial physiology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent J CannistraroDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
George D Glekas
Christopher V Rao
George W Ordal
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Cellular and Molecular Biology Training GrantT32GM007283 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MORRISSEY, JAMES H. · 1985 to 2011
$4.7M
CHEMOTACTIC SENSORY TRANSDUCTION IN BACILLUS SUBTILISR01GM054365 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ORDAL, GEORGE W. · 1996 to 2012
$4.3M
Chemotactic sensory transduction in bacillus subtilisR56GM054365 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ORDAL, GEORGE W. · 2008 to 2008
$445k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM054365NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054365NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM054365NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemoreceptor-CheA kinase-CheW coupling protein complex, with ancillary associated proteins, is at the heart of chemotactic signal transduction in bacteria. The goal of this work was to determine the cellular stoichiometry of the chemotaxis signaling proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Quantitative immunoblotting was used to determine the total number of chemotaxis proteins in a single cell of B. subtilis. Significantly higher levels of chemoreceptors and much lower levels of CheA kinase were measured in B. subtilis than in Escherichia coli. The resulting cellular ratio of chemoreceptor dimers per CheA dimer in B. subtilis is roughly 23.0 ± 4.5 compared to 3.4 ± 0.8 receptor dimers per CheA dimer observed in E. coli, but the ratios of the coupling protein CheW to the CheA dimer are nearly identical in the two organisms. The ratios of CheB to CheR in B. subtilis are also very similar, although the overall levels of modification enzymes are higher. When the potential binding partners of CheD are deleted, the levels of CheD drop significantly. This finding suggests that B. subtilis selectively degrades excess chemotaxis proteins to maintain optimum ratios. Finally, the two cytoplasmic receptors were observed to localize among the other receptors at the cell poles and appear to participate in the chemoreceptor complex. These results suggest that there are many novel features of B. subtilis chemotaxis compared with the mechanism in E. coli, but they are built on a common core.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliImmunoblottingBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21515776
PMCPMC3133262
OpenAlexW2157114956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.