Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21515576›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

The Drosophila gene disruption project: progress using transposons with distinctive site specificities.

Hugo J Bellen, Robert W Levis, Yuchun He, Joseph W Carlson, Martha Evans-Holm, Eunkyung Bae, Jaeseob Kim, Athanasios Metaxakis, Charalambos Savakis, Karen L Schulze and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 229 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
229citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

229 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Harnessing the Power ofCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Functional assays inGenome research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. iScience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Targeted deletion of olfactory receptors inJournal of neurogenetics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hugo J BellenHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Robert W Levis
Yuchun He
Joseph W Carlson
Martha Evans-Holm
Eunkyung Bae
Jaeseob Kim
Athanasios Metaxakis
Charalambos Savakis
Karen L Schulze
Roger A Hoskins
Allan C Spradling

Funding

Transposon induced disruption of most Drosophila genesR01GM067858 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BELLEN, HUGO J · 2003 to 2020
$15.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM067858NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila Gene Disruption Project (GDP) has created a public collection of mutant strains containing single transposon insertions associated with different genes. These strains often disrupt gene function directly, allow production of new alleles, and have many other applications for analyzing gene function. Here we describe the addition of ∼7600 new strains, which were selected from >140,000 additional P or piggyBac element integrations and 12,500 newly generated insertions of the Minos transposon. These additions nearly double the size of the collection and increase the number of tagged genes to at least 9440, approximately two-thirds of all annotated protein-coding genes. We also compare the site specificity of the three major transposons used in the project. All three elements insert only rarely within many Polycomb-regulated regions, a property that may contribute to the origin of "transposon-free regions" (TFRs) in metazoan genomes. Within other genomic regions, Minos transposes essentially at random, whereas P or piggyBac elements display distinctive hotspots and coldspots. P elements, as previously shown, have a strong preference for promoters. In contrast, piggyBac site selectivity suggests that it has evolved to reduce deleterious and increase adaptive changes in host gene expression. The propensity of Minos to integrate broadly makes possible a hybrid finishing strategy for the project that will bring >95% of Drosophila genes under experimental control within their native genomic contexts.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGenes, InsectAllelesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene ExpressionGenome, InsectModels, GeneticMutagenesis, InsertionalMutationPhenotypeDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21515576
PMCPMC3176542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.