Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21515572›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

Focusing forward genetics: a tripartite ENU screen for neurodevelopmental mutations in the mouse.

R W Stottmann, J L Moran, A Turbe-Doan, E Driver, M Kelley, D R Beier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In Search of Molecular Markers for Cerebellar Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Novel Mutations inGenes · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A mutation inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Novel genetic tools facilitate the study of cortical neuron migration.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R W StottmannDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J L Moran
A Turbe-Doan
E Driver
M Kelley
D R Beier
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders · US

Funding

Hair Cell Development in the Mammalian CochleaZIADC000059 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI KELLEY, MATTHEW · 2009 to 2025
$41.8M
Analysis of neurodevelopment using mouse mutagenesisR01MH081187 · NIMH · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEIER, DAVID R. · 2008 to 2012
$2.4M
Use of ENU mutagenesis to identify novel genes required for forebrain developmentF32HD053198 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI STOTTMANN, ROLF W · 2007 to 2009
$159k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD053198NICHD NIH HHS F32HD053198NICHD NIH HHS R01HD0306404NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081187NIMH NIH HHS R01MH081187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of growth, patterning, and differentiation of the mammalian forebrain has a large genetic component, and many human disease loci associated with cortical malformations have been identified. To further understand the genes involved in controlling neural development, we have performed a forward genetic screen in the mouse (Mus musculus) using ENU mutagenesis. We report the results from our ENU screen in which we biased our ascertainment toward mutations affecting neurodevelopment. Our screen had three components: a careful morphological and histological examination of forebrain structure, the inclusion of a retinoic acid response element-lacZ reporter transgene to highlight patterning of the brain, and the use of a genetically sensitizing locus, Lis1/Pafah1b1, to predispose animals to neurodevelopmental defects. We recovered and mapped eight monogenic mutations, seven of which affect neurodevelopment. We have evidence for a causal gene in four of the eight mutations. We describe in detail two of these: a mutation in the planar cell polarity gene scribbled homolog (Drosophila) (Scrib) and a mutation in caspase-3 (Casp3). We find that refining ENU mutagenesis in these ways is an efficient experimental approach and that investigation of the developing mammalian nervous system using forward genetic experiments is highly productive.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic Association StudiesHigh-Throughput Screening Assays1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseAnimalsCaspase 3Chromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticDNA FingerprintingEthylnitrosoureaFemaleGenes, ReporterHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansImmunohistochemistry1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseCasp3 protein, mouseCaspase 3EthylnitrosoureaIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMutagensPafah1b1 protein, mousescrib protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID21515572
PMCPMC3176541
OpenAlexW2119233839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.