Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21513806›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2011

Pulsed infrared light alters neural activity in rat somatosensory cortex in vivo.

Jonathan M Cayce, Robert M Friedman, E Duco Jansen, Anita Mahavaden-Jansen, Anna W Roe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Advances in the Regulation of Neural Function by Infrared Light.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan M CayceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert M FriedmanDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
E Duco JansenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Anita Mahavaden-JansenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Anna W RoeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: anna.roe@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Optical Imaging of Tactile Information in SI CortexR01NS044375 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEDMAN, ROBERT MARK, ROE, ANNA W. · 2003 to 2012
$3.6M
Optical stimulation of neural tissueR01NS052407 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JANSEN, E. DUCO · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
Optical Imaging of Tactile Information in S1 CortexR56NS044375 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A, ROE, ANNA W. · 2008 to 2008
$491k
NINDS NIH HHS NS44375NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044375NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052407NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052407-01NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS044375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed infrared light has shown promise as an alternative to electrical stimulation in applications where contact free or high spatial precision stimulation is desired. Infrared neural stimulation (INS) is well characterized in the peripheral nervous system; however, to date, research has been limited in the central nervous system. In this study, pulsed infrared light (λ=1.875 μm, pulse width=250 μs, radiant exposure=0.01-0.55 J/cm(2), fiber size=400 μm, repetition rate=50-200 Hz) was used to stimulate the somatosensory cortex of anesthetized rats, and its efficacy was assessed using intrinsic optical imaging and electrophysiology techniques. INS was found to evoke an intrinsic response of similar magnitude to that evoked by tactile stimulation (0.3-0.4% change in intrinsic signal magnitude). A maximum deflection in the intrinsic signal was measured to range from 0.05% to 0.4% in response to INS, and the activated region of cortex measured approximately 2mm in diameter. The intrinsic signal magnitude increased with faster laser repetition rates and increasing radiant exposures. Single unit recordings indicated a statistically significant decrease in neuronal firing that was observed at the onset of INS stimulation (0.5s stimulus) and continued up to 1s after stimulation onset. The pattern of neuronal firing differed from that observed during tactile stimulation, potentially due to a different spatial integration field of the pulsed infrared light compared to tactile stimulation. The results demonstrate that INS can be used safely and effectively to manipulate neuronal firing.

Indexed as

Infrared RaysAnimalsElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryLasersMaleNeuronsPhysical StimulationRatsRats, Long-EvansSomatosensory Cortex

Identifiers

PMID21513806
PMCPMC3108823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.