Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21513535›Full record

ArticleHead & neck oncology2011

Specific TP53 mutations predict aggressive phenotype in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective archival study.

Jenni K Peltonen, Kirsi H Vähäkangas, Henni M Helppi, Risto Bloigu, Paavo Pääkkö, Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & neck oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Expression of TP53 mutation-associated microRNAs predicts clinical outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jenni K PeltonenDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. jenni.peltonen@oulu.fi
Kirsi H Vähäkangas
Henni M Helppi
Risto Bloigu
Paavo Pääkkö
Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen
University of Oulu · FIOulu University Hospital · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy in the world in developed countries. Despite the intense research in the area of squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck (HNSCC), long-term survival rate has not changed significantly in this malignancy during recent decades.

methodsIn this study, we focused on TP53 mutations in specific regions, including DNA-binding surface, to determine whether mutations at specific locations of TP53 could be used to help in setting up prognosis and response to therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. We analysed TP53 mutations in 46 HNSCC by PCR-SSCP and sequencing and characterized how different TP53 mutations affect the patient outcome.

resultsTumours containing TP53 mutations in DNA-binding regions (L2, L3 and LSH motif) had a significantly poorer prognosis and response to radiotherapy than tumours outside those regions. Disease-specific 5-year survival of patients with TP53 mutations affecting DNA contacts was 43.5% while it was 77.8% (p < 0.05) in patients with TP53 mutations in other residues not involved in DNA contact. Moreover, nodal metastasis were more prevalent (although not statistically significantly) with TP53 mutations in DNA-binding surface regions. We noticed that the patients with TP53 mutations in L3/LSH motifs had a significantly poorer response (11.4% responding) to radiation than the patients with a wild type p53 (48.6%) or TP53 mutations outside the DNA-binding regions (40%) (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThese data indicate that a TP53 mutation in L2, L3 or LSH is worth pursuing as a marker for predicting prognosis and response to radiation among HNSCC patients.

Indexed as

Genes, p53MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID21513535
PMCPMC3094329
OpenAlexW2161550070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.