ArticleBMC medical research methodology2011
The validation of the standard Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in pre-operative patients with brain tumor in China.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05258461 (An Innovative Smartphone Application for Adverse Event Management During Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Innovative Smartphone Application for Adverse Event Management During Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the impact and mechanisms of behavioral activation on sleep disorders in colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Trial
- Effects and satisfaction of dignity therapy among patients with hematologic neoplasms in the Chinese cultural context: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Trial
- Impact of neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on health-related quality of life in glioma patients: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Pedicled versus free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery: analysis of complications and quality of life.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal disruption of prefrontal dynamics during affective association in depression: an fNIRS case-control study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Association between psychological resilience and global health status/quality of life in patients with brain metastases after resection of primary non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Dual Impact of Glioma Resection on Survival and Health-Related Quality of Life: Resect More, Live Better.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2026Article
- Clinical profiles and health-related quality of life changes after treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a nationwide study in China.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Cancer pain and quality of life structural equation model based on the biopsychosocial model.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Effect of probiotics combined with immune checkpoint suppressors and chemotherapeutic agents on digestive system function, intestinal immunity and prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a quasi-experimental study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of early palliative care in patients with head and neck cancer in Taiwan.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- Comparative characteristics of early-onset vs. late-onset advanced colorectal cancer: a nationwide study in China.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Status of mental and social activities of young and middle-aged patients after papillary thyroid cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Translation and validation of the EORTC QLQ-BR45 among Ethiopian breast cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth related quality of life (HRQOL) has increasingly emphasized on cancer patients. The psychometric properties of the standard Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3.0) in brain tumor patients wasn't proven, and there was no baseline HRQOL in brain tumor patients prior to surgery.
methodsThe questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) was administered at three time points: T1, the first or the second day that patients were hospitalized after the brain tumor suspected or diagnosed by MRI or CT; T2, 1 to 2 days after T1, (T1 and T2 were both before surgery); T3, the day before discharge. Clinical variables included disease histologic types, cognitive function, and Karnofsky Performance Status.
resultsCronbach's alpha coefficients for multi-item scales were greater than .70 and multitrait scaling analysis showed that most of the item-scale correlation coefficients met the standards of convergent and discriminant validity, except for the cognitive functioning scale. All scales and items exhibited construct validity. Score changes over peri-operation were observed in physical and role functioning scales. Compared with mixed cancer patients assessed after surgery but before adjuvant treatment, brain tumor patients assessed pre-surgery presented better function and fewer symptoms.
conclusionsThe standard Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 was overall a valid instrument to assess HRQOL in brain tumor patients in China. The baseline HRQOL in brain tumor patients pre-surgery was better than that in mixed cancer patients post-surgery. Future study should modify cognitive functioning scale and examine test-retest reliability and response validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.