Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21513417›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2011

Michaelis-Menten relations for complex enzymatic networks.

Anatoly B Kolomeisky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural conditions on complex networks for the Michaelis-Menten input-output response.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enzymatic turnover of macromolecules generates long-lasting protein-water-coupled motions beyond reaction steady state.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  7. Motor proteins and molecular motors: how to operate machines at the nanoscale.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anatoly B KolomeiskyDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005-1892, USA. tolya@rice.edu

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Governing Cooperating MotorsR01GM094489 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094489NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM094489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most biological processes are controlled by complex systems of enzymatic chemical reactions. Although the majority of enzymatic networks have very elaborate structures, there are many experimental observations indicating that some turnover rates still follow a simple Michaelis-Menten relation with a hyperbolic dependence on a substrate concentration. The original Michaelis-Menten mechanism has been derived as a steady-state approximation for a single-pathway enzymatic chain. The validity of this mechanism for many complex enzymatic systems is surprising. To determine general conditions when this relation might be observed in experiments, enzymatic networks consisting of coupled parallel pathways are investigated theoretically. It is found that the Michaelis-Menten equation is satisfied for specific relations between chemical rates, and it also corresponds to a situation with no fluxes between parallel pathways. Our results are illustrated for a simple model. The importance of the Michaelis-Menten relationship and derived criteria for single-molecule experimental studies of enzymatic processes are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalEnzymesKineticsStochastic ProcessesEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID21513417
PMCPMC3094465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.