Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21513361›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2011

Strategies for quantifying the relationship between medications and suicidal behaviour: what has been learned?

Robert D Gibbons, J John Mann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How complete are E-codes in commercial plan claims databases?Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2014
    Article
  16. Suicide Prevention.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The statistics of suicide.Shanghai archives of psychiatry · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert D GibbonsDepartment of Medicine, and the Center for Health Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. rdg@uchicago.edu
J John Mann

Funding

THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF SUICIDAL BEHAVIORP50MH062185 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MANN, JOSEPH JOHN · 2000 to 2009
$21.7M
Antidepressant Treatment and Suicidality: Biostatistical/Methodological SolutionsR01MH080122 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GIBBONS, ROBERT D · 2008 to 2011
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS MH062185NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080122NIMH NIH HHS R01MH8012201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years there has been considerable concern that certain classes of drugs, for example antidepressants, may increase the risk of suicide. In this current opinion article, we examine the literature on methodological and statistical approaches to the design and analysis of suicidal event studies. Experimental, ecological and observational studies of the relationship between drugs and suicidal events (thoughts, attempts and completion) are discussed. Areas considered include analysis of spontaneous reporting system data, ecological trends in national and/or small area (e.g. county) suicide rates, meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, and large-scale medical claims data. New statistical and experimental strategies for investigating possible associations between drugs and suicide are highlighted, and we suggest directions for future statistical/methodological research. To put this into context, we then review the most recent literature on the relationship between drugs (antidepressants, antiepileptics, varenicline, montelukast and antipsychotics) and suicidal events. Overall, there appears to be little evidence that drugs increase the risk of suicide and related behaviour. Numerous lines of evidence in adults clearly demonstrate that inadequate treatment of depression (pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy) is associated with increased risk of suicidal behaviour. In children, the results are less clear and further study is required to better delineate which children benefit from treatment and who may be at increased risk as a consequence of treatment. From a statistical and methodological perspective, the field of pharmacoepidemiology is a fertile area for statistical research, both in theory and in application. In general, methods have been adopted from other areas such as general epidemiology, despite the singular nature of many of the problems that are unique to drug safety in general, in particular the study of rare events. Finally, there is considerable debate concerning the communication of risk. For suicide, regulatory action has been taken largely on the basis of evidence suggesting increased risk of suicidal thoughts. However, suicidal thoughts are quite common, particularly among patients with depression, and may have little relationship to suicidal behaviour and/or completion.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsResearch DesignAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAntidepressive AgentsChildData Interpretation, StatisticalDepressionHumansPharmacoepidemiologySuicidal IdeationSuicideSuicide, AttemptedAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.