ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2012
Dissociable and common deficits in inhibitory control in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurocognitive functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and unaffected relatives: A review of the literature.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Transdiagnostic Connectome-Based Prediction of Response Inhibition.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Behavioral response inhibition in psychotic disorders: diagnostic specificity, familiality and relation to generalized cognitive deficit.Schizophrenia research · 2014Article
- Common and disease-specific dysfunctions of brain systems underlying attentional and executive control in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2014Article
- Trait impulsivity as an endophenotype for bipolar I disorder.Bipolar disorders · 2012Article
- Neurobiology of schizophrenia: from outcome to pathophysiological insights.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current research focuses on delineating the neurobiological boundaries between familial risk for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD). Available evidence suggests that inhibitory control may be affected in both disorders. Inhibitory control relies on the dual processes of contextual information maintenance and response inhibition. This study investigated the effect of familial risk of SZ or BD on these two aspects of inhibitory control. Seventeen healthy first-degree relatives of patients with BD (BD-R), 15 healthy relatives of patients with SZ (SZ-R) and 23 demographically matched controls were compared in terms of their performance during Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA), which measures contextually driven response selection, and during the Hayling Sentence Completion Test (HSCT), which assesses contextual response selection and inhibition. Compared to controls and BD-R, SZ-R showed deficits in contextual information processing that resulted in spontaneous errors in the COWA as well as deficits in response inhibition during the HSCT that resulted in higher error rates. BD-R also showed deficits in response inhibition during the HSCT relative to controls, which were, however, less pronounced than for SZ-R. Both relatives groups had longer response times. Our results suggest that failure in contextual maintenance is primarily associated with familial risk for SZ, while response inhibition may be a shared marker of familial risk for both disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21512857What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.