ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2012
Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing willingness to pursue living kidney donation among relatives of patients with kidney disease in the United States.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Willingness to Pursue Living Kidney Donation Among Relatives of Patients with Kidney Disease in the United States.Research square · 2025Article
- Inequities in Organ Donation and Transplantation Among Immigrant Populations in Italy: A Narrative Review of Evidence, Gaps in Research and Potential Areas for Intervention.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Review
- How a compensated kidney donation program facilitates the sale of human organs in a regulated market: the implications of Islam on organ donation and sale.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2022Article
- Deceased Organ Transplantation in Bangladesh: The Dynamics of Bioethics, Religion and Culture.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2022Article
- Kidney transplantation and withdrawal rates among wait-listed first-generation immigrants in Italy.European journal of public health · 2022Article
- The impact of country reimbursement programmes on living kidney donations.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- Is There Decreasing Public Interest in Renal Transplantation? A Google TrendsJournal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Beliefs of UK Transplant Recipients about Living Kidney Donation and Transplantation: Findings from a Multicentre Questionnaire-Based Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Attitudes of Iranian students about organ donation: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Spirituality and religiosity of non-directed (altruistic) living kidney donors.Journal of clinical nursing · 2018Article
- The role of religious leaders in promoting acceptance of vaccination within a minority group: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2013Article
- The ethics of organ transplantation: how comprehensive the ethical framework should be?Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and graft survival rates). We observed an inequality in the number of living kidney transplantations performed between the non-European and the European patients in our center. Such inequality has been also observed elsewhere in this field and it has been suggested that this inequality relates to, among other things, attitude differences towards donation based on religious beliefs. In this qualitative research we investigated whether religion might indeed (partly) be the explanation of the inequalities in living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) among non-European patients. Fifty patients participated in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The interviews were conducted following the focus group method and analyzed in line with Grounded Theory. The qualitative data analyses were performed in Atlas.ti. We found that religion is not perceived as an obstacle to living donation and that religion actually promotes helping and saving the life of a person. Issues such as integrity of the body were not seen as barriers to LDKT. We observed also that there are still uncertainties and a lack of awareness about the position of religion regarding living organ donation within communities, confusion due to varying interpretations of Holy Scriptures and misconceptions regarding the process of donation. Faith leaders play an important educational role and their opinion is influential. This study has identified modifiable factors which may contribute to the ethnic disparity in our living donation program. We argue that we need to strive for more clarity and awareness regarding the stance of religion on the issue of living donation in the local community. Faith leaders could be key figures in increasing awareness and alleviating uncertainty regarding living donation and transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.